[bldg-sim] Comparing ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with ASHRAE 90.1 1999

[Jeff Haberl]

Hello. 

We used RP-1093 profiles for the office building. For other building types, we plan to use a sample of utility bills. The Laboratory has completed an analysis of 90.1 1999 vs 2004 as part of our legislative work, which will be in our 2006 report. 

Jeff
BB 8=!  8=)  :=)  8=)  ;=)  8=)  8=(  8=)  :=')  8=)  8=)  8=? BB

Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D., P.E.............................jhaberl at esl.tamu.edu

Professor......................................................Office Ph: 979-845-6507

Department of Architecture.......................Lab Ph: 979-845-6065 

Energy Systems Laboratory.......................FAX: 979-862-2457 

Texas A&M University..............................77843-3581

College Station, Texas, USA.......................URL: www-esl.tamu.edu

BB 8=/  8=)  :=)  8=)  ;=)  8=)  8=()  8=) 8=?  8=)  8=)  8= BB
 

-----Original Message-----
From: bldg-sim at gard.com
To: bldg-sim at gard.com
Sent: Thu Jan 25 09:28:54 2007
Subject: [bldg-sim] Comparing ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with ASHRAE 90.1 1999

 
We are trying to put together a comparison analysis of ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with the current City of Houston standard (IECC 2000 with 2001 amendments / ASHRAE 90.1 1999). By presenting this analysis we hope to point out that ASHRAE 90.1 2004 is more stringent than the current energy code options.  Any suggestions as to how we can choose our base case specifications?
Dr. Haberl, Are you tuned in?
Thanks 
Jaya Mukhopadhyay

________________________________

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers <http://answers.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx> .