[Bldg-sim] eQUEST vs. Energypro

[John Aulbach]

Eric:
 
EnergyPro is based on DOE-2.1E. eQuest is based on DOE-2.2. I am unsure of what actually changed between the two programs. But if you ever ran DOS based DOE-2, you would find differences between the A through E versions as well.
 
You were expecting a perfect world ??

--- On Wed, 4/22/09, eric wang <shaojieworld2006 at yahoo.com> wrote:


From: eric wang <shaojieworld2006 at yahoo.com>
Subject: [Bldg-sim] eQUEST vs. Energypro
To: "bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org" <bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 4:02 PM







Hi Folks.
 
I recently start to use Energypro to model the VRF system. In order to fully understand Energypro, I created a single zone building served by PSZ DX system in eQUEST and Energypro. All parameters such as location, design days, U factors, wall areas and Shading coefficients are all the same in both models. However, I found the conduction through window, wall, roof and underground floor and window solar gain are all different in LS-C report. Even I exported all DOE reports and compared them side by side, I still didn't figure out what the problem is. Hopefully some experts on this board can answer my question. Your feedback is highly appreciated.
 
Best,
 
Shaojie  
 

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090422/13fae237/attachment-0002.htm>