[Bldg-sim] Appendix G Fan Power

Williamson, Michael mwilliamson at cosentini-ma.com
Thu Jul 2 12:38:52 PDT 2009


I may be a bit late in responding and haven't gone through all the e-mails about it.  That being said,
I think it makes a difference as to how it's divided up.  The difference isn't in fan consumption, but where the fan heat is dumped.  That will effect the cooling and heating loads.  For example, if all the energy were in the supply fan, that would increase supply temperature of require the temperature off the coil to be lowered.  If it was all in the return fan, that fan energy would just end up increasing the return temperature.  I'm thinking more how that difference affects the economizer cycle and ventilation air. I'd proportion it out based on the relative HP's of your supply, return and exhaust fans.  Someone had a 70-20-10 split, which seems to be a good stab at it..



Michael Williamson |
Phone: 617-494-9090 | Fax: 617-494-9292

mwilliamson at cosentini-ma.com<mailto:mwilliamson at cosentini-ma.com>

Cosentini Associates - A Tetra Tech Company
One Broadway - Tenth Floor - Cambridge, MA 02142
www.cosentini.com<http://www.cosentini.com/>



________________________________
From: James Hess [mailto:JHess at tmecorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:28 AM
To: Bldg-Sim
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Appendix G Fan Power

We got a review comment on a recent LEED project asking us to break down the baseline HVAC power into components even though there is no direction, or requirement, from 90.1-2004 to do so.

Can someone please help me understand why this would be necessary?

LEED guidelines say we have to model per Appendix G, but Appendix G doesn't say we have to do this.

I do not think it is necessary to do this as the baseline total fan energy consumption numbers would still be the same.

The equation in Appendix G is meant to give a total allowance (for each system) for supply, return, and exhaust fans. It doesn't matter if we break the allowance down into components or not as the total fan energy consumption remains the same. Therefore, there is no value in doing this.

If we did break the fan energy numbers into components, how would we do that given that there is no direction from ASHRAE or LEED on how to do this?

Thoughts?

Regards,

James A. Hess, PE, CEM
Energy Engineer
TME, Inc.

On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:41 AM, "Jeremy Poling" <<mailto:jpoling at epsteinglobal.com>jpoling at epsteinglobal.com<mailto:jpoling at epsteinglobal.com>> wrote:

This issue will start to become a problem for anyone running energy models for LEED projects - reviewers on the new review teams are asking to see the total fan power for the baseline broken into individual components and reported as such in the template for Energy and Atmosphere Credit 1.  The 90.1-2004 User's Manual is also silent on the issue; however it raises another issue.  In the example (Example G-J on page G-28) the calculations use total building supply CFM for an 80,000SF medical office building.  Since the baseline is System 5 in that example and there would be multiple zones for the baseline, it appears that the equation should be used for the whole building only and not individual systems.  Is this how you are applying the formulas?  The user's manual notes that fan powered VAV boxes are NOT included in the total fan power number as calculated from G3.1.2.9.
Jeremy R. Poling, LEED AP
Senior Sustainability Analyst
Strategic Services
Site Solutions | Operations | Sustainability

EPSTEIN
Architecture
Interiors
Engineering
Construction

Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
________________________________
From: <mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Ellen Franconi
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:37 AM
To: Vikram Sami; Bldg-Sim; Michael I Rosenberg
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Appendix G Fan Power
At my firm, we proportion the baseline total fan power determined as an aggregated W/CFM based on  the hp assigned to the fan motors (supply, return, exhaust) in the design documents. Of course this assumes that your baseline and your proposed design have a one-to-one fan correspondence.
Ellen
Ellen Franconi, Ph.D., LEED AP
Senior Energy Analyst
Architectural Energy Corporation
2540 Frontier Avenue
Boulder, CO 80301
tel. 303-444-4149
fax 303-444-4303
<mailto:efranconi at archenergy.com><mailto:efranconi at archenergy.com>efranconi at archenergy.com<mailto:efranconi at archenergy.com>
<http://www.archenergy.com/><http://www.archenergy.com/>http://www.archenergy.com/


>>> "Rosenberg, Michael I" <<mailto:michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov>michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov<mailto:michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov>> 7/1/2009 4:48 PM >>>
You have calculated the kW/cfm correctly according to the 2004 version of Appendix G. The allowance actually goes up a little in 2007, for your case. As for the second part of your question, no you do not apply the same kW/cfm to the exhaust fan. The calculated allowed fan power the total allowed power for all fans that are part of the system, including the exhaust fan. The cfm component is based on the supply fan cfm only. Unfortunately, Appendix G gives no direction on how to divide the allowed fan power up among the various fans in the system.
Mike
__________________________
Michael Rosenberg
Senior Commercial Buildings Energy Analyst
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
2032 Todd Street
Eugene, OR 97405
(541) 844-1960
<mailto:michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov>michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov<mailto:michael.rosenberg at pnl.gov>
<http://www.pnl.gov>www.pnl.gov<http://www.pnl.gov>
From: <mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Vikram Sami
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Bldg-Sim
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Appendix G Fan Power
G3.1.2.9 Gives you a formula for calculating system fan electrical power for supply, return, exhaust and relief. Lets sat I have a zone with a PSZ-HP that has a supply volume of 1500 cfm. Using this formula along with table G3.1.2.9 I get a fan horse power of 1.29 and kW of 1.17. This equates to 0.00078 kW/cfm - which seems really high.
The second part to my question is assuming I have 500cfm of exhaust in this zone, do I apply the same kW/cfm to the exhaust fans as well as the return fans? It seems that the lower the fan volume the more inefficient the Appendix G values get from these tables.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Vikram Sami, LEED AP
Direct Phone 404-253-1466 | Direct Fax 404-253-1366
LORD, AECK & SARGENT ARCHITECTURE
1201 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30361
Responsive Design * Technological Expertise * Exceptional Service
Please visit our new website | www.lordaecksargent.com<file:///\\www.lordaecksargent.com\>
P Think GREEN before you print.
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
<http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org>http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to <mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG> <mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG<mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>


NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY

This E-mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressees hereof.  In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission.  Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege.  If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090702/9633cae6/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list