[Bldg-sim] SPAM-MED: LEED NC: Existing or New Building

[Dahlstrom, Aaron]

The current LEED template includes an entry for “% new construction.”

If the template is as nifty as I would like to believe, it could scale the percentage thresh-holds to allocate points based on a pro-rated basis.

Anyone validate this?

Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED® AP
In Posse – A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753| m: 267-507-5470| In Posse: 215-282-6800| AKF: 215-735-7290
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>



From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of MatthewRLarson at Eaton.com
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 10:30 AM
To: KFridgen at morrisonhershfield.com; jtorres-coto at mbo1.com; rdh4176 at gmail.com
Cc: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] SPAM-MED: LEED NC: Existing or New Building

We have always used a pro-rated point scale based on floor areas as Kyle describes for USGBC and it has never been disputed.

Thanks,

Matthew Larson, LEED AP BD+C
Project Engineer
Energy Solutions Group
E M C Engineers, Inc.
Eaton’s Electrical Services & Systems
143 Union Blvd, Suite 350
Lakewood, CO 80228
tel: +1 303 328-3419
mobile: +1 303 668-2511
fax: +1 303 974-1239
MatthewRLarson at Eaton.com<mailto:MatthewRLarson at Eaton.com>
www.eaton.com/energysolutions<http://www.eaton.com/energysolutions>
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CC407B.B3A805B0]

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]<mailto:[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]> On Behalf Of Kyle Fridgen
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:32 AM
To: jtorres-coto at mbo1.com<mailto:jtorres-coto at mbo1.com>; 'Rob Hudson'
Cc: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] SPAM-MED: LEED NC: Existing or New Building

The CaGBC allows using a pro-rated point scale based on the relative floor areas of new and existing.  Not sure if this is the same for USGBC.

Kyle

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]<mailto:[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]> On Behalf Of Jorge Torres-Coto
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 11:00 AM
To: 'Rob Hudson'
Cc: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] SPAM-MED: LEED NC: Existing or New Building

You use the existing building criteria for % and points in LEED if your existing portion is greater than  half of the whole project sq.ft. (existing + addition).

Jorge E. Torres Coto   [cid:image002.jpg at 01CC407B.B3A805B0]
4830 Viewridge Ave.
San Diego, CA 92123
p              858.751.0933
f              858.751.0937
c              858.688.6088
[cid:image003.gif at 01CC407B.B3A805B0]
________________________________
From: Rob Hudson [mailto:rdh4176 at gmail.com]<mailto:[mailto:rdh4176 at gmail.com]>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:52 AM
To: jtorres-coto at mbo1.com<mailto:jtorres-coto at mbo1.com>
Cc: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: SPAM-MED: [Bldg-sim] LEED NC: Existing or New Building

Yes, I agree that i should use the existing envelope for the existing conditions of the existing building and the ASHRAE Min for the new building.  But it comes down to whether EA Credit 1 follows the new building % or the existing building %.  it is a 2 point difference that could effect strategies for saving energy later in the design.

Rob

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jorge Torres-Coto <jtorres-coto at mbo1.com<mailto:jtorres-coto at mbo1.com>> wrote:
The baselines for the existing portion are what is there now.

The baselines for the new portion (addition) are ASHRAE definitions.

This should help considerably in your overall energy efficiency gains.

It all comes down to % new vs. % existing, on how much you can gain.

Jorge E. Torres Coto   [cid:image002.jpg at 01CC407B.B3A805B0]
4830 Viewridge Ave.
San Diego, CA 92123
p              858.751.0933<tel:858.751.0933>
f              858.751.0937<tel:858.751.0937>
c              858.688.6088<tel:858.688.6088>
[cid:image003.gif at 01CC407B.B3A805B0]
________________________________
From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org>] On Behalf Of Rob Hudson
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:32 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: SPAM-MED: [Bldg-sim] LEED NC: Existing or New Building

I have a unique situation where the architect is taking an existing building and majorly renovating it (definition of major per LEED is HVAC, envelope and interior spaces) and then building an addition which is roughly the same size of the existing building, give or take a 1000 sqft.

Has anyone run into this before or have any insight that might help me explain which avenue to take to my boss?  I am currently thinking new building, but if it was existing then that helps me even more.

--
Rob Hudson



--
Rob Hudson

This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110712/fd8983a2/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 39998 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110712/fd8983a2/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1226 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110712/fd8983a2/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 14532 bytes
Desc: image003.gif
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110712/fd8983a2/attachment-0002.gif>