[Bldg-sim] energy savings from 2001 to 2004 90.1

[Nathan Miller]

I swear I've seen some graphs before showing the progression of 90.1 and
the relative savings between cycles. It is, of course, highly dependent on
your building type and climate.

 

Here are some useful links to DOE reports that will probably help you
(check out the "Determinations" for quantitative comparisons):

http://www.energycodes.gov/analysis/#savingsEstimates 

 

This one specifically compares 90.1-1999 with 90.1-2004 for commercial
buildings, which is the closest I could find to your specific request
(2001 is just 1999 + addenda, isn't it?).
http://www.energycodes.gov/status/documents/determinations_com_dif04.pdf

 

Nathan Miller, PE, LEED AP BD+C

Mechanical Engineer/Senior Energy Analyst

O 206-285-7100 | D 206-788-4577

 <http://www.rushingco.com/> www.rushingco.com

 

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jill Dalglish
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:40 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] energy savings from 2001 to 2004 90.1

 

Hello,

Does anyone have a feel for a percentage savings going from the 90.1-2001
to 90.1-2004? For example, if a school building achieved a 38% savings
over the 2004 code, what would the estimated savings range be as compared
to the 2001 code?

Thank you,

-- 



Jill Dalglish
Dalglish Daylighting

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120404/d5d38091/attachment-0002.htm>