[Bldg-sim] Building envelope

Jeremiah Crossett jeremiah at setnrgh2o.com
Fri Jan 20 00:02:22 PST 2012


Though I do not retract my statement with regards to energy plus and open
studio, I do agree that eQUEST is a great starting point.

I tend to use both, (eQUEST for preliminary, then Energy Plus, then
crossrefrence my Energy Plus model output with the eQUEST run) but started
with Energy Plus because I wanted to be able to model more then just
thermal and electrical energy systems such as, green roofs, solar electric,
solar thermal, vertical & horizontal wind turbines and have been recently
been modeling phase change materials. At first it was a bit intimidating,
but I got a feel for it pretty fast and now do not find the IDF editor to
be a difficult of an interface for input data, and google sketch up can be
used for the geometry and thermal zones.
The exciting thing about energy plus is the open source tools available
from NREL's Open studio project.
http://openstudio.nrel.gov/

And the new "Simergy" interface being realised by Laurence Berkley in April.
http://eetd.lbl.gov/bt/simergy/key.html

Bently havacomp has a new interface as well
http://www.bentley.com/en-US/Products/Hevacomp+Dynamic+Simulation/

And then there is design builder:
http://www.designbuilder.co.uk/content/view/29/44/


To me it makes more since to start with the latest and most powerful
software, that is being funded by the USDOE and is updated every 6 months.
eQUEST is great, but in the long run Energy Plus is a more valuable skill
set in my opinion. Also there are more features, and you can do interesting
things with the output...

A good example of something that is (from my understanding) not possible
with eQUEST my current research for phase change materials, is visualized
in this model of the generic phase change materiel from an example file, as
compared to a baseline building..( currently working on the new version
with bioPCM product data.).
https://docs.google.com/a/setnrgh2o.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Angnu5sp0FF9dFB6RlNYSkZyMW5MUTd0cmNxZGhpbnc&hl=en_US#gid=28


To Robert I am very interested in dueling software! I also have a small
factory that I have yet to do the simulation for with drop box full of
details we could use in the duel ! Please let me know if you want to as it
sounds fun:)








On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Alex Krickx <akrickx at seriousenergy.com>wrote:

> Hi Alex,****
>
> ** **
>
> There’s been a lot of good feedback on these lists. I think a question to
> keep in mind while picking a modeling software is: what is your target
> building and target output?****
>
> ** **
>
> You mention envelope performance – I’ve used some fenestration (window)
> specific modeling tools in the past when the building type is appropriate
> and the level of detail needed is not as high as to require a full
> eQUEST/EnergyPlus model.****
>
> ** **
>
> Comfen and Resfen developed by LBNL are great tool for commercial and
> residential analyses of fenestration impacts. I’m sure there are very many
> other tools that focus on components of a building. That may be an option
> for you as well. ****
>
> ** **
>
> From one Alex to another, if I had to pick one, my vote would be for
> eQUEST as an accessible modeling environment with a great user-base (this
> list-serv and the archives) as well as many people teaching eQUEST classes
> across the country.****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Alex Krickx****
>
> ** **
>
> Alex Krickx, LEED AP****
>
> Building Energy Specialist****
>
> Serious Energy, Inc.****
>
> 1250 Elko Dr, Sunnyvale, CA 94089****
>
> (t) 408.541.8124****
>
> akrickx at seriousenergy.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be
> confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient then you have received it in error and any review, distribution
> or copying of this message and any attachments is prohibited and you are to
> notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete immediately this
> message and any attachments.*****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:
> bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf Of *Leonard Sciarra
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:21 AM
> *To:* bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Bldg-sim] Building envelope****
>
> ** **
>
> Speaking from an architects perspective and admittedly novice energy
> simulator, Equest was pretty easy to access, and after going to one of the
> Equest courses, that made it even more useful.  Alex, however, your tag
> line indicated you are involved in houses, so in that case Equest may not
> be appropriate, unless they are large multi-family types.****
>
> ** **
>
> *
>                                   *
> *Leonard Sciarra *
> Senior Associate
> +1 (312) 577.6580 Direct
> (847)345.5619 Mobile ****
>
> LN x39995****
>
> *
>                                   *
> *Gensler *
> 11 East Madison Street
> Suite 300
> Chicago IL 60602 ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:
> bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris Flood
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:38 PM
> *To:* bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
> *Cc:* mark dewsbury
> *Subject:* Re: [Bldg-sim] Building envelope****
>
> ** **
>
> Alex,****
>
> ** **
>
> I would agree with Cheney here. The wizards available in eQuest will allow
> you to create and simulate typical buildings and various scenarios
> relatively quickly and easily and with a good level of confidence. The
> documentation which accompanies the eQuest download contains very useful
> reference and guidance documentation.****
>
> ** **
>
> Good luck.****
>
> Chris
>
> On 2012-01-18, at 9:20 PM, Cheney <chenyu73 at gmail.com> wrote:****
>
> I do not think it is a good idea for a beginner to start with Energy Plus.
> Bear in mind, it is not so user friendly. Even a senior energy modeler may
> not be able to grasp it easily. Equest is more strait-forward to my mind.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards, ****
>
>  ****
>
> Cheney****
>
>  ****
>
> LinkedIN @ http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/yu-cheney-chen/27/637/72b ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jeremiah Crossett <jeremiah at setnrgh2o.com>
> wrote:****
>
> My advise to Alex is to start with Energy Plus, as it has the most
> development put into it and the mose capabilities.****
>
> Also Open studio has some great information as to where to start.
> http://openstudio.nrel.gov/ ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:50 PM, mark dewsbury <Mark.Dewsbury at utas.edu.au>
> wrote:****
>
> Dear All,****
>
> The paper from referred to by Alex is no 6-7 years old. There has been a
> lot of movement in building simulation since then. ****
>
> Has anyone published formally or informally anything since 2005? ****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks****
>
> Mark Dewsbury (PhD)
>
> Residential Thermal Performance Research
> School of Architecture & Design
> University of Tasmania
> Locked Bag 1324
> Launceston 7250
> Ph: 03 6324 4471
> mob: 0417 290 807
> fax: 03 6324 4088
> e: mark.dewsbury at utas.edu.au****
>
> Dr Mark Dewsbury is currently a member of the Nationwide House Energy
> Rating Scheme Technical Advisory Committee (NatHERS TAC) ****
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* leen peeters [mailto:l.f.r.peeters at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 19 January 2012 7:35 AM
> *To:* Alex Colta
> *Cc:* bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Bldg-sim] Building envelope****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi Alex,****
>
>  ****
>
> welcome to the world of nerds ;-)****
>
>  ****
>
> There is an intersting document to start with:****
>
>
> http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/pdfs/contrasting_the_capabilities_of_building_energy_performance_simulation_programs_v1.0.pdf
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> That will probably get you a nice intro. If you are into the maths and
> equations, check out Joe Clarke's book on building simulation.****
>
> Also Jan Hensen recently published one on building simulation.****
>
>  ****
>
> Good luck and welcome!****
>
>  ****
>
> Leen****
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Alex Colta <
> alex.colta at rtsbuildingenvelope.com> wrote:****
>
> Good afternoon
>
> My name is Alex, and I'm new to building simulation world , and i saw you
> have many simulation software ,
>
> *1.from my understanding the most used ones are eQuest and Trace 700, is
> it true ?,*
> *   what the difference between these two, *
>
> *2.i would like to simulate more building envelope, what software suit
> more for that ?*
>
> Thank you very much for your support  and help
>
> with best regard
>
> Alex****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
> Jeremiah D. Crossett****
>
> Setanta Energy & Water****
>
> Phone: 503-688-8951****
>
> Email: jeremiah at setnrgh2o.com****
>
> http://www.setnrgh2o.com/****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>


-- 
Jeremiah D. Crossett
Setanta Energy & Water
Phone: 503-688-8951
Email: jeremiah at setnrgh2o.com
http://www.setnrgh2o.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120120/068afda3/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list