[Bldg-sim] Cooling Design Calc Methods

Dru.Crawley at bentley.com Dru.Crawley at bentley.com
Thu Jul 5 14:42:14 PDT 2012


Energyplus uses the same heat balance method as the RTS design calcs in the ASHRAE Fundamentals.

But the design calcs are different.. read up on the methods. I.E., no sun, no internal loads for heating. And full occupancy, full loads, etc for cooling.

Jim nailed it... Caveat emptor.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jim Dirkes" <jim at buildingperformanceteam.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 4:21 pm
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Cooling Design Calc Methods
To: "'Hall, Brendan'" <BHall at karpinskieng.com>, "bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org" <bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>

Dear Brendan,
Caveat emptor: I have not attempted this type of comparison, since my “day job” is energy modeling with E+, not load calculations.
In no particular order:

1.       I suspect you are correct to assume that E+ has a more rigorous load calculation routine, but do not know much about HAP

2.       I applaud your effort to “right size” equipment.  There is a lot of anecdotal and some published information which suggests up to 50% oversizing for cooling systems, and everyone wins if less capacity can be installed and still work properly.

3.       I have the feeling that HAP and E+ define various load differently.

a.       There’s no other reason why HAP would show a solar load in the middle of the night; that’s plainly wrong if we’re talking about true solar impact.

b.      Similarly for roof conduction, ASHRAE and thermodynamics tell us that a roof will probably radiate energy to the night sky at least in the pre-dawn hours (and thus give a negative load to the zone).  HAP is showing low, declining, but still positive values at all hours.  Not knowing your roof construction, however, I am not sure what to expect.

c.       Lighting load for E+ reflects your lighting input energy, but HAP appears to be showing something like “net load to the cooling system”

d.      Ditto for Occupant loads

e.      If it is true that E+ and HAP define things differently, I don’t think you can directly compare loads as you are doing in the “E+ loads” and “HAP loads” charts.   HAP seems to miss the lunchtime load dip altogether, for example.  Did you check the Output:Variable, zonename, Zone/Sys Sensible Load Predicted, Timestep? Or some other variable? (or check with OpenStudio or DesignBuilder to see what their graph data represents?)

4.       Floor conduction was a discussion thread on the EnergyPlus Yahoo forum about a month ago and, apparently, is a big factor in some zones.  This is a two-edged sword; if you ignore it, a major load influence may be missing.  If you include it, better define it properly!

5.       With properly or autosized systems, E+ always displays the same exactly-at-setpoint as you are showing.  I am not sure why HAP shows that the room is 1-2F away from setpoint.

6.       In the E+ Loads chart, there appears to be NO load from “Computer + Equip” and “Lighting” appears only during mid-day.

7.       In the “HAP loads” chart, Window Transmission is always a positive load; I suspect that the outdoor temp falls below zone setpoint at some time during the night, so this should be a negative load.

Executive summary:  Load calculations are the stuff of which lawsuits are made if done poorly, so you want to be well informed about how your software is responding to your inputs.  HAP was, I think, primarily a load calc program that evolved to do energy calculations.  EnergyPlus was an energy calculation program that, with proper inputs can be used for load calculations.  You may want to nose around or ask a question on the E+ forum (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ ) or on the E+ Help Desk site (http://energyplus.helpserve.com/ ) for more on this topic.

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Hall, Brendan
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 2:43 PM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Cooling Design Calc Methods

Hey all,

I am looking at an energy plus based sim program and one of the major selling points would be doing the load calcs in the same program as the energy modeling. From what I have read, the heat balance method that E+ uses should be more accurate than the transfer function method that a widely used load calc program like HAP would use. However the results are different so I wanted to get people’s thoughts on the subject.

I did a test case, a 20 x 20 office space (384 ft conditioned area) with one southern facing window.

-          10 ft tall

-          4 People

-          1 W/ft2 Lighting

-          0.5 W/ft2 Equipment

-          ASHRAE Office default schedules

-          Basic Walls and Roof, ASHRAE minimum windows (U=.55,SHGC=.4)

-          Design Weather – 95 db / 75 wb

I’m attaching some of the results, but overall the E+ calc has a lower peak load. Occupant, lighting and plug loads seem to follow their schedules. HAP looks like it very heavily weights the delayed load effect (TFM) even though I used a medium weight (70lb/ft2) wall (fyi - changing it to a lightweight wall has some but not a huge effect). HAP also ignores the slab heat loss in its cooling calculations. This shows up most clearly in the unoccupied zone temperature. In HAP the residual loads drive the temperature up to 82 where in the E+ calc the slab loss dominates, driving the temperature into the 60s. I could see leaving it out of the peak to be conservative but then allowing the unocc temperature to jump up overnight and having to deal with that load seems a bit too unrealistic. HAP also seems to over predict the peak roof conduction gain, probably due to the use of the sol-air temperatures, which I have read can over predict gains.

I tend to want to believe the E+ analysis because I know that it’s calculation methods are in general more rigorous but I am very interested what others may think, sim engines are known for being poor design load predictors (I’m looking at you eQuest) and HAP is a very established and trusted program.

Thanks in advance for anyone that feels like diving into this with me.

Brendan Hall



More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list