[Bldg-sim] Addition, or Separate Building?

Nick Caton ncaton at smithboucher.com
Tue Dec 10 09:01:01 PST 2013


I agree completely.

Let the scope/purpose of your modeling efforts decide whether modeling both building as one model is going to be beneficial.

>From my experience, the extra work entailed in properly setting up a representative "campus" plan may well be less work than just modeling both buildings, and if in the course of your studies you intend to address efficiency measures applied/unique to both buildings, I expect it will be more efficient and simpler to work within a unified project.

Best regards,

~Nick

[cid:489575314 at 22072009-0ABB]

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036
fax 913.345.0617
www.smithboucher.com

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of David Eldridge
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:30 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Addition, or Separate Building?

90.1 is flexible to model only one building or as a combined building, the determinant is what the client's purpose is in deciding to have an energy model project completed.

You could obviously model the whole complex with the specific central plant equipment, or else a single building could be modeled using district energy sources for heating and cooling depending on what the goal was for the study.

David


David S. Eldridge, Jr., P.E., LEED AP BD+C, BEMP, BEAP, HBDP
Grumman/Butkus Associates



From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Christian Kaltreider
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:09 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Addition, or Separate Building?

Hello Group,

I am modeling an existing building which could be seen as two buildings connected by a short hallway.  The quick story on this facility is that there were two buildings which were connected by hallways at some point, and are now on the same chilled and hot water systems. I'm having trouble finding a clear definition in 90.1 which tells me whether I should be modeling this as one building or two with a shared energy plant.  This is not a LEED project; I am only interested in a 90.1 interpretation.

Does anyone know of any clarifications, interpretations, or past experience which could help guide me?

Thanks,
Christian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20131210/2d7fa616/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20131210/2d7fa616/attachment-0002.jpg>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list