[Bldg-sim] Chilled beam Vs conventional VAV systems

Jim Dirkes jim at buildingperformanceteam.com
Tue Jun 10 03:18:29 PDT 2014


The ASHRAE Journal has at least two detailed articles in the past ~6 months comparing these.  The first was by Steve Taylor and included many considerations for controls and design differences.  The second was a case study of a large building somewhere in Asia (I think).
Sorry I can’t give specific references – I’m about to depart for the day.

James V Dirkes II, PE, BEMP, LEED AP
www.buildingperformanceteam.com<http://www.buildingperformanceteam.com/>
Energy Analysis, Commissioning & Training Services
1631 Acacia Drive, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
616 450 8653

From: Bldg-sim [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Sanket Puranik
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:46 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Chilled beam Vs conventional VAV systems

Hi all,

I have modeled chilled beams and conventional VAV systems for an office building. I am getting 28% lower annual energy consumption with chilled beams.

Has anyone done similar comparison? I would like to confirm if such energy savings are achievable with chilled beams??

Thanks and Regards,
Sanket
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140610/02931b4a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list