[Bldg-sim] Chilled beam Vs conventional VAV systems

[David Eldridge]

28% reduction sounds like a big difference if you are referring to total energy use of the building.

Can you go back to your two cases and show each end-use to verify where the savings is occurring?

DSE Mobile

On Jun 10, 2014, at 1:46 AM, "Sanket Puranik" <sanketpuranik at gmail.com<mailto:sanketpuranik at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

I have modeled chilled beams and conventional VAV systems for an office building. I am getting 28% lower annual energy consumption with chilled beams.

Has anyone done similar comparison? I would like to confirm if such energy savings are achievable with chilled beams??

Thanks and Regards,
Sanket
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG<mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140610/39b60e5c/attachment.htm>