[Equest-users] CIRs in LEED
Dahlstrom, Aaron
ADahlstrom at in-posse.com
Wed Dec 1 08:29:37 PST 2010
Nick -
About your question on CIRs in LEED:
I think LEED 2009 reviewers aren't bound by any previous CIRs - http://www.gbci.org/Certification/Resources/cirs.aspx
However, the rumors continue that this could be changing, with "LEED Interpretations" - http://www.leeduser.com/topic/usgbc-offer-precedent-setting-leed-interpretations-along-cirs
Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED(r) AP
In Posse - A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753| m: 267-507-5470| In Posse: 215-282-6800| AKF: 215-735-7290
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:31 PM
To: alanc at dwcei.com; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] FW: Solar panels
Hi Alan,
<SNIP>
I have my own general LEED question for everyone:
I thought a fundamental change in LEED v3 is that they no longer consider precedent (CIR's) a justification for anything... Any project's LEED review team is fully permitted to completely change their stances between projects as they deem fit to make their case-by-case re-interpretations. Is my world-view overly bleak, or is it advisable to caution others to take any CIR's with a grain block of salt these days?
~Nick
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CB9148.57A86E40]
NICK CATON, E.I.T.
PROJECT ENGINEER
Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway
olathe ks 66061
direct 913 344.0036
fax 913 345.0617
www.smithboucher.com
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Alan Crittendon
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 12:07 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] FW: Solar panels
I sent this yesterday but have a couple more things to add:
1) how does LEED deal with solar power and does Section G2.4 ASHRAE 90.1-2007 just mean that you can't take credit for the utility buying back the extra energy or cant model at all?
2) Has there been any CIRs that discuss solar PV from LEED?
Alan Crittendon, PE, LEED AP
DW Collier Engineering, Inc.
________________________________
From: Alan Crittendon [mailto:alanc at dwcei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:28 PM
To: 'equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org'
Subject: Solar panels
Does ASHRAE 90.1 allow the use of solar panels when calculating the proposed bldg? if so how do you model them?
Alan Crittendon, PE, LEED AP
DW Collier Engineering, Inc.
This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101201/28ef487e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101201/28ef487e/attachment.jpg>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list