[Equest-users] Confirmation for finding the Baseline Energy Model Supply Airflow

Otto Schwieterman oschwieterman at fhai.com
Wed Sep 8 13:25:48 PDT 2010


You are correct, I was describing the MIN-FLOW/AREA (VAV zone minimum
airflow). 

 

I allow eQUEST to auto-size the design airflow rates based on G3.1.2.8.
( a supply-air-to-room-air temperature difference of 20 F). If the
heating room temperature is 72, the supply air temperature is set to 92
F. If the cooling room temperature is 75 F, the supply air temperature
is set to 55 F. I allow eQUEST to size the reheat capacity. In many
cases, eQUEST sizes the airflow for small rooms such as individual
restrooms and storage rooms at the minimum zone airflow / area which
results in high unmet heating hours. This is when I increase the
MIN-FLOW/AREA for that specific room. In this case, the FLOW/AREA and
the MIN-FLOW/AREA are related to each other.

 

As described in the archives, it is important to determine why each room
has unmet hours. Sometimes the problem is the same for every room (like
a scheduling problem) and other times it is specific to an individual
room (not enough airflow for small rooms with little or no internal
loads).

 

From: Hwakong Cheng [mailto:hwakong at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:57 PM
To: Otto Schwieterman; cmg750 at gmail.com; kathryn.kerns at bceengineers.com
Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Confirmation for finding the Baseline Energy
Model Supply Airflow

 

Wait a minute! I think we are mixing very different keywords and
functions here, both in the modeling world and in reality. This is
fundamental to understanding VAV systems.
 
Kathryn and Carol were discussing FLOW/AREA or the minimum design
airflow. This is the zone design airflow (or VAV max airflow) that
eQUEST starts with as a minimum when autosizing. If you are letting
eQUEST autosize the zone design airflow, then the program will increase
the airflow from that starting point to meet the load. Most zone loads
will require more airflow than this so this value is not really that
important, until you start setting it too high. Typical office interior
zones are usually less than 1 cfm/sf so FLOW/AREA=1 will probably
oversize interior zones. To the original question, in my experience,
insufficient zone airflow is seldom the cause for unmet hours. Neither
are system airflow or primary coil capacity, especially if you are
letting eQUEST autosize these. Appendix G (G3.1.2.1) gives bad advice on
this situation. You have to dig a little deeper in the reports (like
SS-R) to understand the cause of the unmet hour. If it's unmet heating
hours, I would try looking at the REHEAT-DELTA-T or MAX-SUPPLY-T or
HEAT-SET-T depending on your system type. If you are VAV, you need
HEAT-SET-T defined in order to have a heating coil in your AHU. Also, I
think a lot of people confuse the COOL-TEMP-SCH and DESIGN-COOL-T (and
same for heating side). The schedule describes the zone temperature
setpoint at each hour, not DESIGN-COOL-T. There are tons of discussions
in the archives about how to deal with unmet hours. Although it can be
very effective at reducing unmet hours, I think increasing the zone
THROTTLING-RANGE should be among the very last options to fix unmet
hours, when nothing else fixes the problem. 
 
Otto, you are describing MIN-FLOW/AREA or the VAV zone minimum airflow.
This is the minimum airflow that is required when the zone is either in
deadband, or deadband and heating, depending on when you have a
reverse-acting or proportional thermostat. This keyword should have no
impact on whether the zone meets cooling loads. If you have a
proportional t-stat, then a low MIN-FLOW/AREA could impact whether you
have enough reheat capacity. If you have a reverse-acting thermostat,
this shouldn't really have any impact on unmet hours, unless you have a
zone with very low internal loads and insufficient reheat capacity. In
that case, you should probably be fixing the reheat capacity, not the
zone minimum. 
 
Although the keywords and names are very similar and easy to confuse,
the eQUEST dictionary help files describe all of these variables very
clearly.
 

________________________________

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:47:17 -0400
From: oschwieterman at fhai.com
To: cmg750 at gmail.com; kathryn.kerns at bceengineers.com
CC: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Confirmation for finding the Baseline Energy
Model Supply Airflow

Appendix ASHRAE 90.1 2007 Appendix G3.1.3.13 VAV Minimum Flow Setpoints
(System 5 and 7) states:

 

"Minimum volume setpoints for VAV reheat boxes shall be 0.4 cfm/sf of
floor area served or the minimum ventilation rate, whichever is larger."

 

For systems 5 & 7, I will set the minimum flow rate to 0.4 CFM/SF. If I
have high unmet hours due to the small amount of CFM, I will increase
the value on a room by room basis. The baseline's flow rates are
typically 30% less than my proposed model. The fans typically run more
often in the baseline model. 

 

Does anyone else have a different way to model the flow rates for the
LEED Baseline model?

 

From: Carol Gardner [mailto:cmg750 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:02 PM
To: Kathryn Kerns
Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Confirmation for finding the Baseline Energy
Model Supply Airfllow

 

You must use the 1.15 and 1.25 multipliers to meet LEED requirements. I
would look at the throttling range that eQ is defaulting to. if it's .5
F, which is I think what it is for PSZ, I would raise that to1 or 2 F,
which is reasonable. Then I would look at the space loads, equipment
especially and make sure all that looks good, then I'd look at the
schedules, make sure they are good, and then I'd look at the cfm/sf.
It's not unreasonable to match it to your proposed building and I don't
know of any issue LEED has with doing that.

Carol

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Kathryn Kerns
<kathryn.kerns at bceengineers.com> wrote:

 

Yes, Carol I know the default airflow value is very low. Usually the
eQuest airflow auto sizing routine will select larger values than the
default. The problem is: what if the eQuest baseline energy model
selects airflows larger than the default cfm/sqft airflow values but the
baseline energy model still ends up with greater than 300 unmet hours or
the baseline energy model has more than 50 unmet hours greater than the
proposed energy model? 

 

Do you start increasing the baseline energy model airflows above the
auto sized airflow value in the thermal blocks that are having unmet
hours issues, or do you retain the auto sized airflow value and start
manually increasing the baseline heating and cooling capacities that
were also auto sized by eQuest using the 1.15 and 1.25 oversized
coefficients?

 

 

Kathryn Kerns

Systems Specialist

BCE Engineers, Inc.

| Ph: 253.922.0446 | Fx: 253.922.0896 | 

 

 

________________________________

From: Carol Gardner [mailto:cmg750 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:22 PM
To: Kathryn Kerns


Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org

Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Confirmation for finding the Baseline Energy
Model Supply Airfllow

 

Kathryn,



I think that .5 cfm/sf is too low. I never saw it used when I was
designing HVAC systems except for an occasionally used interior space. I
immediately change it to1.0 cfm/sf which I feel is a good place to
start. For highly loaded rooms with lots of internal gain I sometimes up
that amount after I have checked the other possible inputs.

Carol

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Kathryn Kerns
<kathryn.kerns at bceengineers.com> wrote:

 

Everyone, 

 

We are having a discussion at the office about how to define the supply
airflow and energy model baseline. I pick the baseline system type per
Appendix G (packaged single zone, packaged VAV, etc., set the heating
sizing ratio to 1.25 and the cooling sizing ratio to 1.15, leave the
heating and cooling capacities blank so the model will auto-size, and
then set the default airflow to 0.5 cfm/sqft and let eQuest run. I then
check to see if the baseline energy model unmet hours are less than 300
and are within 50 hours of the proposed model. If the baseline energy
model is above 300 unmet hours or isn't within 50 hours of the proposed
model, I will then start tweaking the airflow in the baseline energy
model thermal blocks that are causing the unmet hour issues to solve the
problem. 

 

Is this what everyone else is doing or do leave the airflow with the
default values it calculated with the 0,5 cfm/sqft limit and enter
capacity values in the previously blank HVAC cooling and heating
capacities slots so the baseline energy model stops auto-sizing? 

 

Thanks.

 

 

Kathryn Kerns

Systems Specialist

BCE Engineers, Inc.

| Ph: 253.922.0446 | Fx: 253.922.0896 | 

 

 


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG




-- 
Carol Gardner PE




-- 
Carol Gardner PE

________________________________________________________________________
________________
Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. intends to send this transmission
(including any attachments) only to the
designated individual or entity.   If you received this message in
error, please notify the sender by replying
to the electronic mail (if electronic) or by telephone at the number
indicated on this document.
Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. has taken reasonable precautions to
ensure no viruses are present in the
electronic mail.  Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc., will not accept
responsibility for any loss or damage arising
from the use of this electronic mail or attachments. Use, disclosure,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction
of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and maybe
unlawful.   Any information included in
this transmission that is not related to contracts with our
authorization, verbal or written, by Fanning/Howey
Associates, Inc. may not be covered by our professional liability
insurance. 
 


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG

________________________________________________________________________________________
Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. intends to send this transmission (including any attachments) only to the
designated individual or entity.   If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying
to the electronic mail (if electronic) or by telephone at the number indicated on this document.
Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in the
electronic mail.  Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc., will not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising
from the use of this electronic mail or attachments. Use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction
of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and maybe unlawful.   Any information included in
this transmission that is not related to contracts with our authorization, verbal or written, by Fanning/Howey
Associates, Inc. may not be covered by our professional liability insurance. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100908/2f664252/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list