[Equest-users] Modeling DES

Anthony Hardman Anthony at GreenEngineer.com
Mon Jan 10 07:15:56 PST 2011


If you’re referring to modeling a virtual plant with constant efficiency
curves as opposed to the actual design with mfgr performance curves, then I
think the latter is more appropriate for the first building.

 

Anthony Hardman, PE

LEED AP BD&C

Building Performance Analyst

 

THE GREEN ENGINEER, LLP

Sustainable Design Consulting – Energy Modeling – LEED Project Management 

50 Beharrell St

Concord, MA 01742

O: 978/610-2801

C: 720/840-7862

 

 <http://www.greenengineer.com/> Description: TGE Logo
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahardman81> Description: images5
<http://twitter.com/#!/a_Hardman> Description: t4

 

 

From: Will Mak [mailto:wmak at epsteinglobal.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 7:33 AM
To: Anthony Hardman; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Modeling DES

 

I agree, Option 2 is definitely the better method to do a full accounting of
the DES.

 

However, does it make more sense to model the virtual plants or the actual
proposed design in the proposed model?

 

William Mak, LEED Green Associate
Mechanical Design Engineer

EPSTEIN
Architecture
Interiors
Engineering
Construction

600 West Fulton Street
Chicago, Illinois 60661-1259

D: (312) 429-8116
F: (312) 559-1217
E: wmak at epsteinglobal.com
W:  <http://www.epsteinglobal.com/> www.epsteinglobal.com

þ Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please
consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

From: Anthony Hardman [mailto:Anthony at GreenEngineer.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:55 PM
To: Will Mak; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Modeling DES

 

I agree, that doesn’t make any sense.

 

Bottom line, you want to do a full accounting of the DES, therefore you have
to use option 2.

 

Having worked on 4 of these under the DES v2.0 guidance, that’s what I would
do.  For what it’s worth, it’s far better than v1.0 and they openly say it’s
a work in progress (see para 4 sec 1.2).  I think the confusion results from
GBCI defining a DES as being located offsite (read the introduction
paragraph), so to be consistent in Table 4, they have to say model a virtual
onsite DES.  

 

Anthony Hardman, PE

LEED AP BD&C

Building Performance Analyst

 

THE GREEN ENGINEER, LLP

Sustainable Design Consulting – Energy Modeling – LEED Project Management 

50 Beharrell St

Concord, MA 01742

O: 978/610-2801

C: 720/840-7862

 

 <http://www.greenengineer.com/> Description: TGE Logo
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahardman81> Description: images5
<http://twitter.com/#!/a_Hardman> Description: t4

 

 

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Will Mak
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:01 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Modeling DES

 

Hello all,

 

I am working on a project that needs some guidance from you all!

 

The project consists of 3 office buildings and 1 dining hall/auditorium
building in a corporate campus environment. The buildings are being designed
and constructed via 3 phased stages with Phase 1 containing 1 office
building and the dining hall/auditorium building, Phase 2 with 1 office
building, and Phase 3 for the final office building. The dining
hall/auditorium building contains a campus chilled water system that is to
serve air handling units for each of the office buildings as well as the
amenities building itself.

 

We plan on submitting each phase’s buildings as separate projects under an
umbrella of a master site since it is a corporate campus environment.
Because the District Energy System (DES) is within one of the Phase 1
buildings, we referred to page 7 of USGBC’s  “Treatment of District or
Campus Thermal Energy in LEED V2 and LEED 2009 – Design & Construction” for
guidance:

 

Downstream equipment – all heating or cooling systems, equipment, and
controls located within the LEED project building and/or on the project site
associated with transporting the thermal energy of the DES into heated or
cooled spaces. This includes the thermal connection or interface with the
DES, secondary distribution systems in the building, and terminal units. 

Exception: When the building housing the thermal energy plant is itself
seeking LEED certification, then the project shall treat the DES equipment
as “downstream equipment” for the following prerequisites and credits: 

• EA prerequisite 1 

• EA prerequisite 2 

o Mandatory Measures: The district energy equipment shall comply with all
mandatory measures from ASHRAE 90.1-2004. 

o Prescriptive Method: The district energy equipment shall comply with any
applicable prescriptive requirements 

o Performance Method: The district energy equipment shall be modeled as
upstream equipment, NOT downstream equipment. USGBC recommends that such
projects use modeling Option 2 (described below). 

• EA prerequisite 3 

• EA credit 3 

• EA credit 4 

• EA credit 5 

 

Unfortunately, the statements contradict each other. If the equipment is to
be treated as “downstream equipment”, then I have to include all the
chillers, boilers, pumps, etc. However, if the equipment is to be treated as
“upstream equipment”, I just create virtual chillers/boilers with some
efficiencies based on Table 4 on page 12:

 


Table 4: Energy Source for Option 2 District heating 

Baseline 

On-site heating plant or fossil fuel furnaces as defined in ASHRAE 90.1
Appx. G, tables G3.1.1A and G3.1.1B, representing code minimum efficiency2 


Proposed 

Virtual on-site hot water or steam boiler representing upstream DH system 


District cooling 

Baseline 

On-site cooling plant or packaged cooling as defined in ASHRAE 90.1 Appx. G,
tables G3.1.1A and G3.1.1B, representing code minimum efficiency3 


Proposed 

Virtual on-site chiller representing upstream DC system 

 

Phase 2 and 3 buildings will be straight forward on the energy modeling
because we will have to model virtual systems to simulate the DES since it
is physically outside of the LEED project. How have you interpreted this
before with the DES within the LEED building that is attempting LEED
certification and which approach would you use in modeling using eQuest?

 

 

William Mak, LEED Green Associate
Mechanical Design Engineer

EPSTEIN
Architecture
Interiors
Engineering
Construction

600 West Fulton Street
Chicago, Illinois 60661-1259

D: (312) 429-8116
F: (312) 559-1217
E: wmak at epsteinglobal.com
W:  <http://www.epsteinglobal.com/> www.epsteinglobal.com

þ Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please
consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

 

 

William Mak, LEED Green Associate
Mechanical Design Engineer

EPSTEIN
Architecture
Interiors
Engineering
Construction

600 West Fulton Street
Chicago, Illinois 60661-1259

D: (312) 429-8116
F: (312) 559-1217
E: wmak at epsteinglobal.com
W:  <http://www.epsteinglobal.com/> www.epsteinglobal.com

þ Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please
consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110110/44e33de1/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1364 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110110/44e33de1/attachment-0006.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1997 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110110/44e33de1/attachment-0007.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1971 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110110/44e33de1/attachment-0008.jpeg>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list