[Equest-users] Baseline Heat Pump vs Geothermal HP

Dahlstrom, Aaron ADahlstrom at in-posse.com
Thu Oct 20 06:36:10 PDT 2011


Also, the water loop pressure drop may not default to a reasonable number.
I'd recommend examining the water loop pressure drops in detailed edit mode to see if they match your design / intuitions.

Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED(r) AP
In Posse - A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753| m: 267-507-5470| In Posse: 215-282-6800| AKF: 215-735-7290
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>



From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Keith Swartz
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:58 PM
To: nic; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Baseline Heat Pump vs Geothermal HP

The default fan control for PVVT is variable speed. If your geothermal heat pumps are constant speed, which is more typical, you will need to change that.

[cid:image001.png at 01CC8F0B.B3AFB1F0]

________________________________
Keith Swartz, P.E., LEED AP

Energy Engineer / Senior Project Manager
Energy Center of Wisconsin
455 Science Drive, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711
Phone: 608.238.8276 x123
Fax: 608.238.0523

The Buildings Team
Design decisions through energy, economics and emissions analysis.
www.ecw.org/Buildings<http://www.ecw.org/Buildings>

Energy Center University
Your gateway to sustainable design training and online education programs.
www.ecw.org/university/<http://www.ecw.org/university/>
From: nic [mailto:ffonics at gmail.com]<mailto:[mailto:ffonics at gmail.com]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:48 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: [Equest-users] Baseline Heat Pump vs Geothermal HP

Hello,
I am becoming concerned with how much better my geothermal Heat Pump modeled as PVVT (with geo HP under heating cooling respectively) are performing over the Ashrae Baseline required system 4 (Packaged Single Zone HP).  I am approaching the 40-50% mark.  I understand that the geothermal system should be appreciably less in energy consumption since there is little energy spent on the heat sink other than pumps.

Both were specified by Equest through wizard selection, but the PVVT Geo HP system was confirmed to be the best selection for a multizone system in a Equest users response.

Am I correct in thinking that the Single Zone HP are incorrectly duplicating themselves for each zone serviced?  Therefore, increasing the energy consumption.  Whereas, each PVVT system can service multiple zones.

Should I use the PVVT system for the baseline and modify it to simulate a PSZ-HP?

Thanks for any help.


This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111020/6c3e8009/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 23772 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111020/6c3e8009/attachment-0002.png>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list