[Equest-users] Non-Coincident Peak Demand and Coincident Peak Demand
Sami, Vikram
Vikram.Sami at perkinswill.com
Mon Aug 13 10:25:07 PDT 2012
In theory, coincident peak should be less than non-coincident peak. The coincident peak is the components that contribute to the building peak, while the non-coincident is the peak for each individual component (that may occur at different times of the day) - so it should be higher.
Vikram Sami, LEED AP BD+C
Sustainable Design Analyst
1315 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30309
t: 404-443-7462 f: 404.892.5823 e: vikram.sami at perkinswill.com www.perkinswill.com<http://www.perkinswill.com/>
Perkins+Will. Ideas + buildings that honor the broader goals of society
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Nimesh Prajapati Nimesh
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:06 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Non-Coincident Peak Demand and Coincident Peak Demand
Dear All,
In eQuest Output files I am getting one output parameters as Non-Coincident Peak Demand and Coincident Peak Demand. So I am confused in analysis. My Question is - what is the difference between them?
Refer the attachment.
Which is the true reflected Peak Demand of the building analyzed?
Thanks,
Nimesh Prajapati
(+91 9687133492)
HVAC Design Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120813/bb800aa7/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list