[Equest-users] Fan Cycling Indication in Detailed Report?
David Reddy
david.j.reddy1 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 16:19:56 PST 2012
Michael-
For zonal systems, I'd suggest reviewing the ZONE heating and cooling
SS-P reports as another way to see what is going on. I just reviewed
these reports for a current project, and found that I get nearly the
same results for both DOE-2 system types HP and PTAC using these two fan
control options:
1. No outside air specified at SYSTEM or ZONE level, FAN-SCHEDULE set
to all 1's, and FAN-CONTROL = CYCLING
2. No outside air specified at SYSTEM or ZONE level, and as Robby
suggested, FAN-SCHEDULE set to all 0's and NIGHT-CYCLE-CONTROL =
CYCLE-ON-ANY
Attached is an xlsx summary for one zone using one of these scenarios.
As you can see, the system fans are not running 8760. The report
indicates 6010 run hrs. However, as indicated part-load hour summary,
the there are many values lower in the range, indicating the system is
only cycling on for a fraction of the hour. The total annual effective
full load hours is only 1166.
A couple things to try:
* What DOE-2 system type are you using? A zonal system, such as HP or
PTAC? If you are using a single-zone system, such as PSZ or PVVT,
then FAN-CONTROL = CYCLING has no impact. If you only want the
system to cycle on to meet loads, you have to set INDOOR-FAN-MODE =
INTERMITTENT (CONSTANT is the DOE-2 default).
* Do you specify outdoor air at the SYSTEM or ZONE level? If you
truly want no OA supplied by the system, I would default all OA
related keywords to "no_default"; a zero value may still be
recognized by the program as a value and hence, cause the system to
run 24/7.
Also, related to the night-cycle control option, remember to define a
MIN-AIR-SCH with 0's during unoccupied hours. Otherwise, when the
system cycles on at night to meet the setback temp, the OA dampers will
remain open. This is a bit of a tradeoff, since it also disables the
economizer. But for heating dominated climates, where cycling is most
often to meet heating load, this is typically the best way to go.
Otherwise, if you are comparing two designs (i.e. proposed and LEED
basline), the design with better envelope performance is more likely to
not have as many night cycle hours, and hence, use less energy heating
(or possibly cooling) ventilation air. This oversight can have a huge
impact on savings comparisons...
Hope this helps,
- David
On 2/1/2012 11:35 AM, Michael Mantai wrote:
> I tried this but it had no effect. My annual kWh equals my total fan
> power times 8760, so I'm certain that the fans are on continuously.
> There must be something that is keeping them on, but I cannot find it.
>
>
> On 2/1/12 1:52 PM, "Robby Oylear" <robbyoylear at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> On a recent project I modeled this same situation. The way I was
> able to force the system to only operate during a call for cooling
> or heating was by defining a fan schedule with all hours set to 0.
> Per the DOE2.2 help documentation on fan schedules:
> - If the value is 0, the fans are off but may be turned on by
> NIGHT-CYCLE-CTRL if zone temperatures warrant it.
>
> Make sure to allow night cycle control (cycle on any). This
> basically defines all hours of the day to be "night" and the fan
> will cycle on to meet the load in the space.
>
> Robby Oylear, LEED AP
> /Mechanical Project Engineer
> Senior Energy Analyst
>
> /*D* 206-788-4571
> */www.rushingco.com/*<http://www.rushingco.com/>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Chris Hadlock
> <cjhadlock at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I would just run an hourly report for one of your heat pump
> systems and pick up hourly flow rate and fan energy. This way
> you can see how often your fans are running and whether they
> are cycling or running continuously. With heat pump systems,
> there are key words under the Fans tab (for a given system)
> that will indicate the control on the fans. One is night cycle
> control and the other is indoor fan mode (within the Flow
> Parameters tab). If your fans are not cycling, it is likely
> due to those two key words (or the fan schedule you have
> specified).
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Mantai
> <mmantai at systemworcx.com> wrote:
>
> I'm modeling a 6-story hotel. Baseline is PTAC. I set up
> the baseline to
> have outside air at each PTAC with the fans running
> continuously. The
> Proposed Case is watersource heat pumps. Outside air is
> through dedicated
> units at the corridors. I've set (at least I am trying to
> set) the heat
> pump fans to cycle on the thermostat. I've set the heat
> pumps to 0 CFM
> outside air. When I run the two models, the ventilation
> fan energy is
> nearly identical. I expected to see some fan energy
> savings with the heat
> pump fans cycling. When I look at the detailed output
> report, the SS-C for
> the heat pumps seems like it is showing fans running
> continuously. I say
> this because the "hours floating" are less than the "hours
> fans on", and the
> "hours fans cycle on" is zero. This implies to me that
> the fans are running
> continuously. However, when I look at the reports that
> show fan energy
> consumption, the months with floating hours show
> significantly reduced fan
> energy, which to me implies that they are cycling. The
> total fan kW in the
> proposed model is about twice that of the baseline, so
> from that standpoint
> maybe the kWh being about the same is correct. I set up
> the PTAC units at
> .3 watts/CFM per ASHRAE. I set up the heat pumps fans
> with a static
> pressure input from the design drawings rather than input
> the fan motor
> sizes (used .2" w.g. Static).
>
> Also, my space cooling energy is higher in the proposed
> case than the
> baseline, even though the envelope is better, the
> watersource heat pumps
> have a lower EIR and the design lighting power density is
> 30% lower. I
> haven't dug into that yet because I'm still trying to
> verify my fan cycling
> is working.
>
> My questions are, can anyone explain how to interpret the
> SS-C reports in
> terms of fan cycling, or point me to which report I should
> look to really
> verify the fans are cycling? And anyone modeled a similar
> comparison, and
> if so, what type of results did you get with respect to
> cooling energy and
> fan power consumption? Seems like I should be seeing savings.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank
> message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120201/66b7686b/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SS-P Zone Htg-Clg Performance.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 22036 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120201/66b7686b/attachment-0002.bin>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list