[Equest-users] EUI info on sanitary lift stations
David Reddy
david at 360-analytics.com
Wed May 21 21:20:59 PDT 2014
Another local PNW firm has looked at this, though the data appears to be
on the potable water side. However, perhaps the concepts/signatures are
applicable to your situation.
http://www.pnws-awwa.org/uploads/PDFs/conferences/2013/Fri%20AM%20Dist_Res%2003%20Campbell%20PNWS%20AWWA%20RH2%20Energy%20Efficiency%20Presentation.pdf
On 5/21/2014 7:28 PM, Jeff Haberl wrote:
> FYI.
>
> Check with the ASCE and/or the AWWA, sanitary engineering division.
>
> In general, for College Station, the data shows about 3 Wh/gallon for
> overall sewage treatment. So , the number should be a fraction of this
> fur the lift station ..
>
> Jeff
>
> Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D., P.E.inactive, FASHRAE, FIBPSA
> Department of Architecture
> Texas A&M University
> College Station, Texas 77845-3581
> Office: 979-845-6507, Lab: 979-845-6065
> Fax: 970-862-2457, jhaberl at tamu.edu <mailto:jhaberl at tamu.edu>,
> www.esl.tamu.edu <http://www.esl.tamu.edu>
>
> On May 21, 2014, at 5:28 PM, "Robby Oylear" <robbyoylear at gmail.com
> <mailto:robbyoylear at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Also worth taking into consideration the static head that the lift
>> station is working against. A pump station that is moving 10 MGD at
>> 100 ft of head may use more energy than a pump station that is moving
>> 20 MGD at 30 ft of head for instance.
>>
>> I did some audits on two pump stations but was not able to find any
>> national data that compared pump station energy use.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Sami, Vikram <vikram.sami at zgf.com
>> <mailto:vikram.sami at zgf.com>> wrote:
>>
>> It also seems to me that EUI (energy/ft2 of building) is probably
>> not an appropriate metric for this. The energy use is probably
>> more dependent on how much stuff they move. Energy per ft3 (of
>> 'stuff') might be more appropriate.
>>
>> *Vikram Sami*
>> BEMP, LEED BD+C
>> Associate Partner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ZGF ARCHITECTS LLP
>> *T *206.521.3509 <tel:206.521.3509> *E *vikram.sami at zgf.com
>> <mailto:vikram.sami at zgf.com>
>> 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2400
>> Seattle, WA 98104
>>
>> *From:* Equest-users
>> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
>> <mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org>] *On Behalf
>> Of *Nick Caton
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 19, 2014 1:31 PM
>> *To:* Jim Fowler; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
>> <mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Equest-users] EUI info on sanitary lift stations
>>
>> If it were me, I'd start my search with associated equipment reps
>> -- if anybody is aware of such studies or guidelines, I'd have to
>> imagine some with the OEM's are in that circle.
>>
>> Grundfos has a lifecycle cost calculation tool on their website
>> for their lift stations, and I recall them pushing the efficiency
>> of their equipment in their literature and presentations -- you
>> might try them specifically to see if they have performed any
>> case studies of their own, or are otherwise aware of any broader
>> annual energy consumption data.
>>
>> ~Nick
>>
>> <image001.jpg>**
>>
>> **
>>
>> *NICK CATON, P.E.*
>>
>> SENIOR ENGINEER
>>
>> Smith & Boucher Engineers
>>
>> 25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
>>
>> olathe, ks 66061
>>
>> direct 913.344.0036 <tel:913.344.0036>
>>
>> fax 913.345.0617 <tel:913.345.0617>
>>
>> www.smithboucher.com <http://www.smithboucher.com>__
>>
>> *From:*Equest-users
>> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf Of
>> *Jim Fowler
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 19, 2014 12:31 PM
>> *To:* equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
>> <mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
>> *Subject:* [Equest-users] EUI info on sanitary lift stations
>>
>> Does anyone know of a source for EUI comparative data for
>> municipal wastewater lift stations?
>>
>> Jim Fowler, PE, CEA, CBCP
>>
>> Principal
>>
>> 206.954.3614 <tel:206.954.3614>
>>
>> <image002.jpg>
>>
>> Retro-Commissioning and Energy Audits of
>>
>> Municipal Commercial and Industrial Buildings
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The contents of this email and any attachments to it contain
>> confidential and/or legally privileged information from Zimmer
>> Gunsul Frasca Architects LLP or its affiliates. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
>> delivering this message to the intended recipient, be aware that
>> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information
>> contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you received this
>> transmission in error, please contact the sender and destroy the
>> material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Equest-users mailing list
>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
>> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>> <mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Equest-users mailing list
>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
>> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>> <mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140521/da5a14be/attachment.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list