[BLDG-SIM] HVAC efficiencies in DOE2
Andy Lau
asl1 at psu.edu
Tue Jun 20 05:33:19 PDT 2006
I'm working on putting together a document to guide students in defining
the heating and cooling equipment efficiencies that are input to DOE2.2,
specifically eQuest v.3.55. In the process, I've realized that I'm not
that confident on some of these issues and seek the knowledge of this
BLDG-SIM group.
First, HIR for furnaces and boilers, derived from AFUE and Et. Because
eQuest has built-in HIR=f(PLR) curves, the program accounts for
part-load effects like cycling and flue losses. Therefore, I would
expect that it is Et, thermal efficiency, that should be used to
determine HIR=1/Et. The question then is whether there is a documented
relationship for determining Et from AFUE. All I have found thus far is
the California Energy Commission's 2005 "Nonresidential Alternative
Calculation Method (ACM) Approval Manual" wherein there are
relationships for HIR for packed and split systems as well as boilers
(the relationships are in the attached spreadsheet). Not sure where
these relations have come from plus I would expect AFUE to be lower than
Et which is not always the case in these correlations.
Second, EIR for heat pumps in heating mode. My understanding is that
the eQuest input should reflect the COP at 47F outdoor temperature, not
including the supply fan energy use which is modeled separately in
eQuest. If a heat pump is rated in terms of HSPF, then this seasonal
average value must be converted to COP47. I've found an FSEC/ASHRAE
publication, "Climate Impacts on Heating Seasonal Performance Factor
(HSPF) and Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) for Air Source Heat
Pumps," that provides a simple correlation, COP47 = 1.718*HSPF/3.413.
In this correlation, supply fan power is removed from the HSPF using the
ARI standard blower value of 0.365 W/cfm.
Third, EIR for packaged cooling equipment in cooling mode. Here the EIR
should be based on the COP at 95F outdoor, 80F indoor, which is related
to the EER, COP95 = EER/3.413. For smaller units, SEER is often the
reported measure, which accounts for seasonal variation. In the same
FSEC/ASHRAE study, they found this correlation, COP95 =
1.063*SEER/3.413. Again, fan power is backed out of the SEER values
using the ARI standard blower.
On the issue of removing supply fan power when it is included in HSPF,
SEER, or EER, there is the question of whether it should just be removed
from the electrical input, or also as a heat gain.
I would appreciate your comments on these relationships and references
to any other publications that address these issues.
Andy Lau
Associate Professor of Engineering
(814) 863-9075, andylau at psu.edu
www.cede.psu.edu/~andylau
======================================================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM at GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at GARD.COM
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list