[BLDG-SIM] eQuest Default f(PLR) Skepticism
Kevin Madison
kevinjm5000 at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 4 18:46:14 PDT 2007
Perhaps it would help to clarify how DOE-2.2 (the simulation engine
behind eQUEST) calculates hourly energy input for boilers and chillers.
For boilers, the hourly energy input is:
Hourly Energy = Cap(hour) * HIR * HIRf(plr)
So while the HIRf(plr) may increase as part load decreases, which is not
uncommon for standard atmospheric boilers, the energy use will certainly
decrease with plr because the required output of the boiler for the hour
decreases.
For chillers, DOE-2 uses the following relationship to calculate the
electricity input to the chiller each hour:
Caphour = Capacity * CAPf(t1,t2)
PLR = Load / Caphour
dT = t2 -- t1
Elechour = Caphour * EIR * EIRf(t1,t2) * EIRf(PLR,dT) / 3413 Btu/kW
where
Caphour hourly capacity, Btuh (this is dependent on condenser and
evaporator conditions for that hour)
Capacity rated capacity, Btuh
CAPf(t1,t2) correction to capacity for temperatures, curve CAP-FT
t1 leaving chilled-water temperature, °F
t2 condenser temperature, °F
PLR Part load ratio
Load Hourly load, Btuh
dT Temperature differential across chiller, °F
Elechour electric input to the chiller, kW
EIR rated electric input ratio
EIRf(t1,t2) correction to EIR for temperatures, curve EIR-FT
EIRf(PLR,dT) correction to EIR for part-load ratio and dT, curve EIR-FPLR
Again, the primary factor affecting chiller energy use is the cooling
capacity needed for that hour. Just because you don't have access to the
dual function information doesn't mean you shouldn't be accounting for
it in the simulation. Chiller performance is dependent on all operating
conditions including load, condenser conditions and evaporator conditions.
For a more complete discussion on these simulation concepts, refer to
the DOE-2 documentation included with the eQUEST installation. Look in
Dictionary:HVAC Components:Boiler:Boiler Energy Consumption and
Dictionary:HVAC Components:Chiller:Chiller Energy Consumption.
Kevin Madison
Madison Engineering PS
Seattle WA
USA
Taylor Keep wrote:
>
> eQuest models boiler and chiller plants with default part load curves
> that I think may be incorrect. As I understand it, the f(PLR) curves
> are used as a direct multiplier on the HIR for boilers and EIR for
> chillers, with full load (1.0 PLR) corresponding to a 1.0 multiplier.
> If this is true, the f(PLR) curve should increase at part load for
> atmospheric boilers (atmospheric boilers become somewhat less
> efficient at part load). The default atmospheric boiler curve
> decreases almost linearly down to zero! I am having a tough time
> wrapping my head around this.
>
> On the chiller side, the default f(PLR) is a bi-quadratic function
> using both dT and PLR as variables, so it is f(PLR,dT). Since I never
> have this dual function information in my general chiller selections,
> I have been using a standard f(PLR) function quoted at a fixed dT from
> the manufacturer. The curve I get from a McQuay 400-ton chiller
> selection is quadratic, with decreasing EIR down to 50% load and
> increasing EIR below 50% load. I seriously doubt that the eQuest
> default corresponds with this entry because changing the function
> produces a huge change in performance.
>
> Do any of you have any thoughts or suggestions about the accuracy of
> default f(PLR) curves? Should I scrap my "improved," real curves -
> they are drastically changing the model performance?!?!
>
> Taylor
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> Taylor Keep
> Mechanical, LEED® AP
> _ _
> Arup
> 901 Market Street Suite 260
> San Francisco, CA 94103
> tel: 415 946 0279
> fax: 415 957 9096
> taylor.keep at arup.com
> _www.arup.com_ <file://www.arup.com>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup business
> systems are scanned for acceptability of content and viruses
>
> ======================================================
> You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
> to the BLDG-SIM at GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
> from this mailing list send a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at GARD.COM
>
======================================================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM at GARD.COM mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at GARD.COM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20071004/089062a3/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list