[Bldg-sim] LEED NC2.2 Energy Modeling Program Choice

[Peter Simmonds]

Yes.

 

Peter Simmonds Ph.D.
Senior Associate, Advanced Technology Group

IBE Consulting Engineers
14130 Riverside Drive Suite 201
Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
p:   (818) 377-8220 ext. 246
f:    (818) 377-8230
m:  (818) 219-1284

This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message

 

.

 

 

________________________________

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
Trujillo
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:26 PM
To: Elmes, Wilmouth; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] LEED NC2.2 Energy Modeling Program Choice

 

Any experience with Energy Pro for LEED modeling (project in
California)? 

 


Carlos A. Trujillo
LEED(r) AP
Northern California

Engineering Manager
1587 Bentley Dr.
Corona, CA 92879
951-340-9685 (Direct)
951-340-9688 (Facsimile) 
http://www.ldimechanical.com <http://www.ldimechanical.com/> 

 

________________________________

From: Elmes, Wilmouth [mailto:wae11 at columbia.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:52 PM
To: Carlos Trujillo; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Bldg-sim] LEED NC2.2 Energy Modeling Program Choice

 

EQuest is okay for this, the Carrier HAP ( hourly analysis program) and
Trane Trace 700 would also suffice. In my opinion  the Carrier HAP
required input data forms are some what simpler than the Tran Trace,
however the Trane Trace has more system templates and associated system
graphics associated with each template, so you can just about model
anything ( ice storage, cogen, vav with reheat, vav with perimeter
radiation, etc, etc,) I prefer the Trane Trace for high rise commercial
buildings and the  Carrier HAP for smaller 4 to 5 Multi family type
buildings.  Just my preference for what it is worh

 

Wilmouth elmes

 

________________________________

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
Trujillo
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 2:13 PM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] LEED NC2.2 Energy Modeling Program Choice

 

I am wondering if any can provide me with some insight on LEED Energy
Modeling to obtain EAc1 with LEED NC2.2. I am specifically attempting to
determine which program I will use to model baseline vs. design. I am
proficient in EnergyPro, however it seems many people prefer to use
eQuest. I have also heard some good things about the HAP program from
Carrier. Any thoughts or suggestions? 

 

Our typical project types consist of new 4 or 5 story multi-family
apartments. It should also be noted that almost all of our work is
within California. 


Thanks. 

 


Carlos A. Trujillo
LEED(r) AP

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20081202/7e2fd580/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3506 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20081202/7e2fd580/attachment-0002.jpeg>