[Bldg-sim] A90.1 local buildings
Robert Gengelbach
rgengelbach at sustainablemech.com
Tue Aug 4 16:30:04 PDT 2009
Yes, I think when you can verify the permanence of the shading structure the
USGBC should be more lenient in the allowing credit for the shading
(especially since the argument is that it may not be there in the future)
cid:image003.png at 01C9AB43.F0BEE290
Robert Gengelbach, PE, LEEDR AP
Sustainable Mechanical Design Associates, LLC
89 Monroe Center NW
Suite 302
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
P: (616) 776-9009
F: (616) 776-9010
C: (616) 570-2329
rgengelbach at sustainablemech.com
P Please print only if necessary
From: surekha tetali [mailto:surekhatetali at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:36 AM
To: Robert Gengelbach
Cc: Chris Yates; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] A90.1 local buildings
Hello,
Through our experience of a couple of projects, we would suggest that the
project should be credited when there is considerable saving through the
shading of local buildings/structures.
Please find an appropriate view over this issue at:
http://greenbuildinggenie.com/tips/item/13-neighborhood-building-shading
This site seems to be cataloging all such issues as either Hot Tips or Hot
Issue. I find the collection quite informative .
Regards,
Surekha Tetali.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Robert Gengelbach
<rgengelbach at sustainablemech.com> wrote:
During a EAc1 training seminar put on by the USGBC I distinctly remember
them saying that you shouldn't account for shading from other structures,
there is no way to be sure that the other structure will remain for the life
of the building that you are modeling.
Error! Filename not specified.
Robert Gengelbach, PE, LEEDR AP
Sustainable Mechanical Design Associates, LLC
89 Monroe Center NW
Suite 302
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
P: (616) 776-9009
F: (616) 776-9010
C: (616) 570-2329
rgengelbach at sustainablemech.com
P Please print only if necessary
From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Chris Yates
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 9:33 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] A90.1 local buildings
Hi
A quick browse through appendix G doesn't mention local buildings in the
shading. Is it true local buildings aren't considered in the shading calc
for A90?
ta
Error! Filename not specified.
Chris Yates
CEng MCIBSE
Associate
Low Carbon Energy Assessor
Zero Energy Design Ltd
10A Portland Place
2-22 Mottram Road
Stalybridge
SK15 3AD
T: 0161 3386200
F: 0161 3031281
M: 0791 2668665
E: chris at zed-uk.com
W: www.zed-uk.com
Error! Filename not specified.
Error! Filename not specified.
Certificate No: GB16647
Error! Filename not specified.
Certificate No: GB16646
Please carefully consider the environment before you print this email.
Company Registered in England & Wales. Registration No. 5815068
Registered Address: 10A Portland Place, 2-22 Mottram Road, Stalybridge, SK15
3AD, UK.
Privilege and Confidentiality Notice:
This email and any attachments to it are intended only for the party to whom
they are addressed. They may contain privileged and/or confidential
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete any digital copies and destroy any paper
copies. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090804/70ef1450/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 12369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090804/70ef1450/attachment-0002.png>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list