[Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

Jeremy Poling jpoling at epsteinglobal.com
Tue Mar 23 11:30:00 PDT 2010


  

I know a couple of the eQuest/DOE2.2 guys watch this list - can you
double check this document and make sure it is up-to-date from your
side?  One thing I saw is that many people on the lists here report
successfully modeling chilled beam systems in eQuest and this document
shows that to not be a capability.

 

JEREMY R. POLING, PE, LEED AP
Associate Vice President,

Senior Sustainability Analyst
Strategic Services
Site Solutions | Operations | Sustainability

EPSTEIN

Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please
consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Sturm, Eric
A.
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:34 AM
To: Travers, Mike; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

 

All,

 

The original document (Simulation Tool Comparison.doc) had dated
information regarding TRACE 700.  We have updated the document to
reflect current and accurate information and added a few capabilities
that have been added to TRACE within the past several years.  With the
additional capabilities added, the document should be updated to reflect
the current capabilities of DOE 2.2, eQUEST, and HAP.

 

Regards,

Eric Sturm

CDS Marketing Engineer

Trane Commercial Systems

Ingersoll Rand

3600 Pammel Creek Rd

La Crosse, WI 54601

 

Office:  +1.608.787.3926

Fax:  +1.608.787.3005

Email:  cdshelp at trane.com <mailto:cdshelp at trane.com> 

Website:  www.tranecds.com <http://www.tranecds.com/> 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Travers, Mike [mailto:mtravers at RDKEngineers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:07 PM
To: Peterson, John (EYP/HP CFS); bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

This is something that I took from another resource and have been
editing.  There are many moving targets relative to the release of
software updates etc., and may not be completely accurate, but the core
information is there

Hope this helps

 

 

Mike Travers, LEED AP | Senior Energy Engineer

 

RDK Engineers

Seaport Center, 70 Fargo Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02210

P: (857) 221-5933 | F: (857) 221-5934 | M: (617) 938-0430

mtravers at rdkengineers.com

http://www.rdkengineers.com <http://www.rdkengineers.com/> 

Boston Globe Top Places to Work 2009

Boston Chamber of Commerce Business Excellence Award 2009

 

 

 

 

From: Peterson, John (EYP/HP CFS) [mailto:jpeterson at hp.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:03 PM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] Discrepancy between Equest & Trace 6.2

 

Has there been any information released on the differences between
energy simulation programs?  We have a bid requirement with a certain
percentage listed and we have been asked to address the differences
between the bid model and the newly proposed model.  

 

Thanks in advance -

John

 

John Peterson, PE, LEED AP

HP Critical Facilities Services delivered by EYP

6600 Rockledge Drive, 4th Floor

Bethesda, MD  20817

cell: 202-731-5835 

 

 

 

 

This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the
designated recipient(s). In addition, this message and its attachments,
if any, may contain information that is proprietary, confidential, or
privileged and exempt from disclosure or otherwise protected under
applicable law. If you are not the designated recipient of this message,
you may not disclose, reproduce, distribute, or otherwise use this
transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the
intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If
you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the
sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete this message from your
system.

 

________________________________

The information contained in this message is privileged and intended
only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of
the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this
message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender,
and delete the original message and attachments.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/06fecba0/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 145 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/06fecba0/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5622 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100323/06fecba0/attachment-0001.jpeg>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list