[Bldg-sim] C-factors

[Keith Swartz]

In basement rooms that I have modeled, additional insulation usually has little impact if the space has internal loads that require cooling. The reduced heating energy is offset by additional cooling, since you can no longer get as much cooling from the "cold wall." However, if the room is only heated (no cooling), then insulation makes a big difference. I discovered this when I noticed heating during the summer. (The summer heating went away when I lowered the thermostat setpoint from the default setpoint. It was a utility room.)

________________________________
Keith Swartz, P.E., LEED AP

Energy Engineer / Senior Project Manager
Energy Center of Wisconsin
455 Science Drive, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711
Phone: 608.238.8276 x123
Fax: 608.238.0523

The Buildings Team
Design decisions through energy, economics and emissions analysis.
www.ecw.org/Buildings<http://www.ecw.org/Buildings>

Energy Center University
Your gateway to sustainable design training and online education programs.
www.ecw.org/university/<http://www.ecw.org/university/>
________________________________
From: James V Dirkes II, PE [mailto:jvd2pe at tds.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:32 AM
To: 'James Hansen'; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] C-factors

Sounds right to me.   I've wondered about the relatively low "U" for basements, too.  My best guess for ASHRAE's rationale is that the additional heating load is balanced by reduced cooling load......

The Building Performance Team
James V. Dirkes II, P.E., LEED AP
1631 Acacia Drive NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49504
616 450 8653

From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of James Hansen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:18 AM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Bldg-sim] C-factors

I wanted to run something by everyone to see if this is how most people model underground walls:

For my climate zone (4A), the required C-factor for Underground Wall is 1.140 (no U-value listed).

If you go to Appendix A of 90.1-2004, specifically sections A4.1 and Table A4.2, I *think* that you come to the conclusion that the baseline underground walls should be modeled as 8 inch medium weight concrete block with a density of 115 lb/ft3, solid grouted cores, and NO INSULATION.  This is what A4.1 says, and the published C-factors in Table A4.2 indicate that a C-factor of 1.140 is obtained using this wall and no framing / no insulation.

If you then refer to Table A3.1C, for that wall type, sure enough a C-factor of 1.140 is listed with a corresponding U-value of 0.58.

When I run my baseline model with an underground wall construction having a U-value of 0.58, I end up with way more cooling hours and energy that my proposed model, which has R-13 insulation.  This is presumably because those underground spaces are constantly losing heat thru the poor wall construction to the 55 degree earth heat sink (or whatever eQuest calculates it as).

I'm not complaining, as it makes the proposed system look that much more efficient, but I just wanted to double check that I'm doing this right.

On a side note, I'm having a tough time reducing my unmet load hours for the underground VAV system, but that's besides the point...

Thanks!

GHT Limited
James Hansen, PE, LEED AP
Senior Associate
1010 N. Glebe Rd, Suite 200
Arlington, VA  22201-4749
703-338-5754 (Cell)
703-243-1200 (Office)
703-276-1376 (Fax)
www.ghtltd.com<http://www.ghtltd.com/>


________________________________
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee.  It is the property of GHT Limited.  Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to ght at ghtltd.com<mailto:ght at ghtltd.com>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.  Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100331/977fa771/attachment-0002.htm>