[Bldg-sim] Bldg-sim Digest, Vol 34, Issue 4
Fred Betz
fbetz at aeieng.com
Tue Sep 7 13:27:32 PDT 2010
I like using TRNSYS for projects that include daylighting and natural ventilation. TRNSYS gets cumbersome if you have a lot of zones.
TRNSYS can directly pass natural ventilation information to and from CONTAM, which will give you fairly accurate results. This level of rigor is required for compliance with the LEED natural ventilation pilot credit if you are going for that.
Also its fairly easy to import daylighting results from Daysim or Radiance into the lighting schedules in TRNSYS.
I don't believe TRNSYS will directly do any LCA calculations. At least I have never tried.
eQuest can do daylighting and natural ventilation, but it is not as accurate as using programs that specialize in these types of simulations. Also, I have never tried doing natural ventilation in eQuest for LEED without some support from a separate bulk air flow model for CFD analysis to support the results. I don't know how they will review the model without a supporting analysis outside eQuest.
Fred
FRED BETZ PhD., LEED AP
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS ANALYST
AEI | AFFILIATED ENGINEERS, INC.
5802 Research Park Blvd. | Madison, WI 53719
P: 608.236.1175 | F: 608.238.2614
fbetz at aeieng.com | www.aeieng.com
-----Original Message-----
From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of bldg-sim-request at lists.onebuilding.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:01 PM
To: bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Bldg-sim Digest, Vol 34, Issue 4
Send Bldg-sim mailing list submissions to
bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bldg-sim-request at lists.onebuilding.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
bldg-sim-owner at lists.onebuilding.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Bldg-sim digest..."
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list