[Bldg-sim] Energy Model Cost - best designdoesn'tequalmost LEED points
Carol Gardner
cmg750 at gmail.com
Mon May 16 11:30:07 PDT 2011
It's interesting that just as we are having this discussion, the budget for
CBECS is going away:
http://blog.bepinfo.com/2011/05/death-knell-for-energy-star-building.html.
So even one less source of EUI information for people to use. Ironic!
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Aleka Pappas <apappas at group14eng.com>wrote:
> I did some pre-RFP modeling for Denver Housing Authority to try to help
> them develop realistic & useful energy metric design goals for a recent
> project. We ended up setting a percent energy cost saving goal (ie LEED)
> along with a site *lbs CO2 emissions/ SF* goal for the design. We started
> out with a kBtu/ SF metric, but weren't happy with the way this quantified
> environmental impact in Colorado. This is because most of our electricity
> comes from coal and it's CO2 intensive relative to natural gas, but looks
> better than natural gas when looking at site kBtu/ SF. It's interesting how
> this will change design decisions compared to just looking at energy cost
> savings relative to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline; it's much easier to hit 50%
> savings with an all electric building, but CO2 emissions go up.
> The metrics DHA ended up included in their RFP came out of modeling the
> actual building type in the actual location of the project, so we were
> comfortable with them being reasonable design goals for the 'as-designed'
> building. We also made sure that people understood the difference between
> 'as-designed' modeling and 'operational' building energy use. It was great
> to work with a really progressive client who gets it and wanted to look at
> these details closely.
>
> *Aleka Pappas*
> Building Energy Engineer*
> **
> GROUP14 ENGINEERING, INC. *
> Inspiring better buildings.
> 1325 E. 16th Ave, Denver, CO 80218
> Direct: 720.221.1082/ Main: 303.861.2070/Fax: 303.830.2016
> www.group14eng.com
> <swagner at group14eng.com>
> *Group14 Engineering offers building energy optimization, LEED
> coordination, commissioning, energy audits, LEED EBOM, and greenhouse gas
> analysis.*
>
> On 5/16/2011 10:51 AM, Goldwasser, David wrote:
>
> One variation I was considering to EUI was to look at Kbtu per annual occupant hour vs. Kbtu per area. This came about when I wanted know how to evaluate some operational alternatives such as extending the hours of operation for a facility, or looking at an office running with a rotating staff all working 4x10 hour days a week vs. a smaller static staff in the same building working 5x8 hour days a week. Kbtu/sf2 alone didn't help here, but looking at Kbtu per annual occupant hour did.
>
> Extending operational hours will clearly increase your Kbtu/ft2 (EUI) but the question I wanted to answer is if those extra occupant hours come at a lower energy impact per occupant hour than the baseline case. "Kbtu/ annual occupant hour" addressed this. Is there a similar metric that anyone else is using?
>
> David
>
> --
> David Goldwasser, LEED AP
> National Renewable Energy Laboratory
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:bldg-sim <bldg-sim>-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Sheffer
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 10:16 AM
> To: 'Paul Riemer'; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
> Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Energy Model Cost - best designdoesn'tequalmost LEED
> points
>
> Paul,
>
> The next version of LEED will approach a more standardized metric (EUI Source
> Energy) but still include cost as a metric as well. For those who feel
> strongly that only actual energy use should be used for green building
> certification the LEED EBOM methodologies will be allowed into LEED BD+C
> projects.
>
> USGBC is trying hard to lead us to that better way. If you know the better
> way please share.
>
> Marcus Sheffer
> Energy Opportunities, Inc/a 7group Company
> 1200 E Camping Area Road, Wellsville, PA 17365717-292-2636, sheffer at sevengroup.comwww.sevengroup.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing listhttp://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
--
Carol Gardner PE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110516/2b5767d7/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list