[Bldg-sim] TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR HEAVY AND THICK WALLS
Joe Huang
yjhuang at whiteboxtechnologies.com
Fri May 16 15:16:47 PDT 2014
Luis,
I'm not sure if I have an answer for your problem, but I want to point out some technical
details that may be being overlooked.
1. DOE-2 does not use CTFs, it uses Response Factors, which shares the same approach as
CTFs but uses a different formulation.
2. When DOE-2 says it cannot simulate a layer because it's too thick, that's not because
the RF methodology fails but because DOE-2 has a maximum of 100 time-steps, i.e., 100
hours, for the three response factors (X,Y,Z) to converge to constant COMMON RATIOs that
are used to compute the residual responses from that point on.
3. There are two situations that could cause such convergence problems - (a) the layer is
simply too massive. I know from trial and error that the thickest single-layer of dirt
allowed in DOE-2 is 5.25 ft (1.6 meters), (b) this thickness will be greatly reduced if
there are multiple layers with contrasting thermal properties; again, from
trial-and-error, if there is a layer of insulation below the dirt, the maximum allowable
thickness of the dirt layer will be reduced by half or more. You've mentioned that
someone has mentioned creating multiple thin layers. This will do help with (a), but could
help with (b), provided that the thin layers are graduated in their thermal properties;
I've never tried this so I can't tell how much benefit would there be, but my guess is not
very much.
3. I don't know EnergyPlus well enough to say whether it has a similar hard limit on
convergence and if so, what is it. If not, you might be able to model the same layer in
EnergyPlus and not encounter any difficulties.
4. If all else fails, as others have already mentioned, you can do an explicit solution
using the Finite Difference Method in EnergyPlus, but expect that to slow down your
simulations considerably.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang at whiteboxtechnologies.com
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 5/16/2014 6:37 AM, Luis Miguel Blanes Restoy wrote:
> Luis
>
> You may explore E+ different ways of dealing with CTF (state space method mainly). CTF
> calculations become unstable for short time steps and massive constructions (it is at
> the end a computational problem). E-Quest may decide on your arrangement to be unstable
> before running the simulation (not sure of this). There are solutions to solve this
> problem (Seem 1987), and I guess these have been incorporated into CTF calculation
> within E+. It is a matter of giving E+ a go and try out if your example may work there.
>
> E+ also handles Finite Differences Methods for CTF calculations, but I am not versed in
> this field.
>
> You can find more information in the E+ Engineering Reference Manual.
>
> Regards
> Abrazos desde Hibernia
> Luis
>
>
>
>
> 2014-05-16 14:06 GMT+01:00 Luis Peréz-Lombard <lpl at us.es <mailto:lpl at us.es>>:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> As you probably know, Conduction Transfer Function (CTF) method does not handle
> thick and massive walls, because the accuracy of the CTF coefficients is degraded.
> In particular, in DOE-2, you get the following message:
>
> /“Cannot simulate LAYERS …….. as given. The wall is too thick or too dense”/
>
> I have heard of a possible solution to solve this problem by dividing the wall into
> thin layers. I have made an attempt in e-quest, but the problem remains, and I do
> not know how to proceed.
>
> Any insight on this issue would be appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> LPL
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Luis Pérez-Lombard
> Dr. Ingeniero Industrial
> Profesor Contratado Doctor
> Departamento de Ingeniería Energética
> Escuela Superior de Ingenieros
> Universidad de Sevilla
> Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n
> 41092 SEVILLA
> Tfno.: 95.448.72.56
> Fax: 95.446.31.53
> e-mail: lpl at us.es <mailto:lpl at us.es>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG <mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
>
>
>
>
> --
> LUIS M BLANES RESTOY
> *IRUSE
> *INFORMATICS RESEARCH UNIT FOR SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING
> www.iruse.ie <http://www.iruse.ie>
> mobile Ireland: +353 83 1346875
> mobile Spain: +34 609097818
> skype: lmblanes
> email: lmblanes at gmail.com <mailto:lmblanes at gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140516/2d709a48/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list