[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Internal mass



Hi Shaun,

I haven´t had that much experience with DOE2 or Trace, but I´m 
working with people who have worked with DOE2.

Their opinion is that E+ is having better results with internal mass 
than DOE2.

One thing to have in mind when "building" constructions to study the 
effect of internal mass is not to place a "light" material (carpet, 
expanded polystyrene...) as the outermostlayer as this will eliminate 
the internal mass effect. I don´t know if this helps...

My work with internal mass took a small stop, but I will have a look 
at those models again in the near future.

This topic is very important as internal mass is sure to have a big 
impact in building performance.

Looking forward for more "internal mass" news, good work,
Alexandre

--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sm278424" 
<shaunmartin@s...> wrote:
> I'd like to ask one further question related to this discussion. 
> 
> Has it been found that the heat balance calculations in E+ produce 
> significantly different results from DOE2 and Trace with respect to 
> thermal mass effects?  
> 
> In the model I'm currently working on the thermal 'lag' seems 
almost 
> non-existent. 
> 
> Thanks
> Shaun Martin
> 
> 
> --- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Michael J. Witte" 
> <mjwitte@g...> wrote:
> > It is difficult to sort out all of the different heat transfer 
> mechanisms in a 
> > particular model.  Several issues to explore:
> > 
> > 1.  Have you run a case with no partitions and no internal mass 
to 
> convince 
> > yourself that the mass is having an effect.  Your various cases 
as 
> listed in 
> > the original posting are all somewhat similar to each other, they 
> just vary in 
> > the location and amount of internal mass.
> > 
> > 2.  In the file that was posted, if I understand correctly, the 
> partition walls 
> > use the contsruction "PartitionAlex" which uses 
> material "4_1_10001" as the 
> > outside and inside surface layers.  This material has a solar 
> absorptance of 
> > 0.25, which is quite low.  This will limit how much solar the 
> interior 
> > partitions absorb and limit their impact on the space conditions.
> > 
> > 3.  The ventilation air does not interact directly with the 
> partitions/internal 
> > mass.  It only mixes with the zone air, and then the zone air 
> interacts with 
> > the zone surfaces.  You may notice that internal mass has only a 
> small effect 
> > on mean air temperature, but a larger effect on mean radiant 
> temperature.
> > 
> > 4.  How high are the ventilation rates?  If they are high, then 
> the zone air 
> > temperature will track very closely to the outside drybulb 
> temperature 
> > regardless of how much internal mass is present.  You might also 
> try some cases 
> > with zero ventilation and zero HVAC to see that the internal mass 
> does indeed 
> > dampen the temperature swings.
> > 
> > 5.  There are limits to how much thermal mass can be effective in 
> a given 
> > space.  The amount of heat transferred into the internal mass is 
> limited by 
> > UAdeltaT for convection and by absorptance*area for radiant and 
> solar.  At some 
> > point, more mass makes no difference, because there is not enough 
> heat transfer 
> > at the surface to utilize it.
> > 
> > 6.  The ground temperatures are 16C.  This is quite cool and 
> provides a 
> > significant heat sink.  Decouple the floor from the ground and 
see 
> if the model 
> > behaves more as you would expect.  To develop better ground 
> temperatures, use 
> > the Slab program described in the Auxiliary Programs document.
> > 
> > 7.  Regarding convex zones, the zone must be fully enclosed, and 
> it must not 
> > violate the rule about intercepting more than two surfaces.  If 
> these rules are 
> > violated, the alrogithm does not work properly.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 20 Aug 2004, at 8:42, alexandrevarela2000 wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Rahul,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your interest int his matter. You are mainly right. 
> The 
> > > internal doesn´t "really" afect loads. But internal mass 
> > > should "flatten" indoor air temperature curve. and this is not 
> > > changing that much with increased mass.
> > > 
> > > Partitions interact with outside environment if you use 
> > > FullInteriorandExterior solar distribution model, since E+ 
> calculates 
> > > the radiation incident in these interior walls. In this way 
> > > partitions are affected by outside conditions (sun).
> > > 
> > > This model has natural ventilation. This is another outside 
> condition 
> > > affecting internal partitions.
> > > 
> > > I also have a question about convex and non-convex zones. If I 
> inser 
> > > partitions in a convex zone, in a way that they don't divide 
the 
> > > zone, I can still say that the zone is convex. Is this right? 
> The 
> > > thing is that if using the E+ definition of convex ("A formal 
> > > definition of convex is that any straight line passing through 
> the 
> > > zone intercepts at most two surfaces"), the zone is no longer 
> convex. 
> > > I hope I could make myself clear...
> > > 
> > > Maybe I will just post a generic model in the files folder so 
> > > everybody can check out the geometry and fenestration.
> > > 
> > > Thanks alot for your help,
> > > Alexandre
> > > 
> > > --- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rahul Chillar 
> > > <chillarrahul@y...> wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > >  
> > > > As you put it, its lot dependent of building physics.Mainly 
> because 
> > > the partitions are not exposed to outside enviornment and its 
> > > temperature fluctuates with the zones temperatures and the 
> > > temperature lag depends on its thermal mass. 
> > > >  
> > > > Also generally the zones being seperated by Internal 
> partitions 
> > > have same temperatures on both the sides of the partitions too.
> > > >  
> > > > Hence the effect of partition is negligible on the loads, 
> mainly 
> > > the partition is preventing the convective transfer between the 
> zones 
> > > which would have take place had they not been present. 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Rahul Chillar 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > alexandrevarela2000 <amv@e...> wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > > 
> > > > I´ve simulated a building's internal mass like this:
> > > > 
> > > > 1)Internal partitions as InternalMass (construction type 
> Plywood)
> > > > 2)Internal partitions as InternalMass (construction type 
brick 
> wall)
> > > > 3)Internal partitions modeled as walls (actual surfaces and 
> not 
> > > > internal mass) and using solar distribution FullExterior 
> > > > (construction type brick wall)
> > > > 3)Internal partitions modeled as walls (actual surfaces and 
> not 
> > > > internal mass) and using solar distribution 
> FullInteriorAndExterior 
> > > > (construction type brick wall)
> > > > 
> > > > The results regarding these situations didn´t change that 
> much, 
> > > which 
> > > > doesn´t seem right. On the other hand changing mass 
properties 
> for 
> > > > external walls, roofs or floors does have a large impact on 
> results 
> > > > (specially floor mass).
> > > > 
> > > > Could this be E+ software related, or is this relating only 
to 
> the 
> > > > building's physics?
> > > > 
> > > > If you think it helps I will upload the base model.
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you very much,
> > > > Alexandre
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
> > > > http://www.energyplus.gov
> > > > 
> > > > The group web site is:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
> > > > 
> > > > Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the 
> > > appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > 
> > > >    To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
> > > >   
> > > >    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >   
> > > >    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of 
> > > Service. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks 
> > > > Rahul Chillar 
> > > > Grad Student 
> > > > Building Systems lab
> > > > Univ Of Illinois Urbana Champaign
> > > > 
> > > > 		
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> > > > 
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
> > > http://www.energyplus.gov
> > > 
> > > The group web site is:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
> > > 
> > > Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the 
> appropriate folder
> > > in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
> > > 
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ========================================================
> > Michael J. Witte, GARD Analytics, Inc.
> > EnergyPlus Testing and Support      
> > EnergyPlus-Support@g...



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/dkFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/