[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [EnergyPlus_Support] Tubular Daylighting devices - Beam visible transmittance
Dear all,
As I have uploaded the main.idf, but I think that i forgot to allude all of you. Such that no answer is received.
Just one more info, I have check the surface of dome, and there is a direct beam illuminance level on it.
Thank you for your kind attention and look forward of your reply.
Regards,
Ernest
Kin Wai Tsang <ekwtsang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear Peter,
Thank you for your reply. And I have uploaded a file for your reference. I have try to change the aspect ratio, the occurrence of Beam transmittance > 0 increase. So I guess it has a impact on it. It is welcome if you can find anything wrong for me.
Regards,
Ernest
"Ellis, Peter" <peter_ellis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ernest,
I'm not sure why your tubular daylighting device (TDD) isn't getting beam visible transmittance for greater incidence angles. The beam visible transmittance accounts for the transmitted light from the direct beam of the sun. Are you sure the TDD dome is not mounted on a sloped roof? Is it possible there are other surfaces shading the dome at certain times of the day? I think the documentation in the Engineering Ref is complete; there are no other assumptions that might be causing this behavior. If you are still having problems, please upload your file to the Files area of the Yahoo groups web site.
Thanks,
P
________________________________
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ernest K W Tsang
Sent: Thu 5/22/2008 12:50 AM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Tubular Daylighting devices - Beam visible transmittance
Dear all,
I am currently modeling a lightpipe (tubular daylighting device) with
E+. However, I find a problem. My modeled lightpipe is a vertical one
with an aspect ratio of 11.2 and the pipe reflectance is 0.98. It is
noted that, the beam visible transmittance larger than 0 if and only if
solar altitude larger than 55deg (i.e. incidence angle should be smaller
than 35deg).
As I know that the built-in model is based on Swift and Smith (1995)
model, and I has done a cross checking. It is noted that the
transmittance will approach zero only if it has a angle of incidence
more than 85deg. And even the angle of incident is 80deg, the
transmittance should still about 20%.
So I would like to ask does the beam visible transmittance is account
for the transmittance of light from direct sun? Also does there is any
assumption other than those mentioned in Engineering Document used for
lightpipe calculation. I have check across the source code, and I
cannot find anything wrong in the code.
Regards,
Ernest Tsang
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/