[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: E+ System Requirements



In general, the best thing you can do for a laptop is make sure it has
adequate memory and AS FAST A DISK as you can afford.  Laptop disks
are notoriously slow; I'll take a 7200-rpm that's half the size of a
5400-rpm any day.

That said, E+ is almost always CPU-bound.  CPU performance doesn't
scale directly with GHz, especially across processor lines.  There is
virtually no way to compare the new dual-core processors with their
single-core predecessors based on GHz.  There's not even much useful
correspondence between Intel's various dual-core processor lines.

We make good use of multicore processors by running multiple instances
of E+ simultaneously.  Not all workloads will benefit from that, of
course, and you do have to take manual steps to avoid E+'s penchant
for clobbering its own intermediate files. 

--Todd
-- 
Why are they called 'long shorts'?



--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Crawley, Drury"
<Drury.Crawley@...> wrote:
>
> While EnergyPlus is single-threaded code, it does help to move to a
> dual-core.  Faster hard drive and more memory helps more than CPU clock
> speed.  I moved from a single CPU, 1.8 GHz, 1 GB memory laptop to a dual
> core, 1.2 GHz, 2 GB laptop -- and it ran E+ twice as fast.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JRR
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:00 PM
> To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] E+ System Requirements
> 
> 
> 
> JRR wrote;
> 
> Energy Plus is single threaded code. I understand from monitoring the
> mailing lists and
> responses over  the last 3+ years that it is mostly FORTRAN or rewritten
> FORTRAN
> with object oriented constructs.  As such a dual core CPU will help some
> but not a lot.
> 
> The best machine to get in our opinion is a  roughly 3 year old  XEON
> with dual CPU
> sockets on the motherboard. The motherboard will be a 533 or 667 Mhz
> board with
> DDR-333 memory sticks. The outstanding part is that the XEON  HT CPUs
> came in
> 3.2 Ghz, 3.6 Ghz, and 3.8 Ghz. versions. The Intel SE7525GP2 motherboard
> has
> PCI express x16 graphics card slot,  2x PCI 64, 3x PCI 32, 2x ATA-100
> and 2x SATA I.
> There is an onboard hardware RAID chip that has drivers for both Windows
> XP Pro and
> Linux. That means you can have a dual boot, dual RAID system.....
> 
> We are currently running an Adaptec 29160 SCSI card with a Seagate Ultra
> SCSI 
> Cheetah 10k RPM as the boot disk. We have dual LG DVD+- RW drives with
> each one
> set to different regions.  Both SuSE Linux 11.0 and Win XP Pro show 4
> cores running at
> 3.6+ Ghz.  The drawback is heat. A 650W power supply will just barely
> boot our system,
> and the CPUs  reject  130W EACH at stock speed.  All this takes some
> considerable 
> effort to run.
> 
> A simple, rugged and effective machine would be an Intel DP35DP
> motherboard, Core 2
> Duo CPU at 3.0 Ghz,  2GB or 4GB memory, 2x SATA 2 hard disk, 2x DVD+-
> RW,
> floppy drive, NVIDIA Quadro 1700 PCIe video card.  Get a chassis with
> lots of room - 
> mid-tower or full tower and a 400 w + power supply.  Microsoft is still
> selling Win XP Pro
> to small independent computer shops for another 6 ? weeks, but has
> already stopped 
> supply to larger Computer sellers, at least in the US.  Now you have a
> machine with 
> XP Pro, Vista ( if you really want to ) and SuSE Linux operating system
> choices.
> The Quadro 1700 video card supports the 'CUDA project bringing 192
> parallel GPUs
> to the compute side of the machine in the next year.....
> 
> 
> Yuen Liu wrote: 
> 
> 	
> 	I can confirm that the EPlus Ver.2.2 can run on WindowsME with
> 64MB RAM and a Pentium I 166MHz processor, because  I am still using
> such an antique.
> 	 
> 	However, the speed is about 2 sec. per line of calculation.  To
> do a 4 timestep, 2  DesignDays simulation will take about  2 X 4 x 24 x
> 2 sec. = 384 sec.  That is, about 7 minutes to run a typical 5Z example.
> 
> 	 
> 	It would take less than 30 seconds on the 1.6GHz PC.  RAM size
> and dual core do not seem to make much difference in processing speed.
> 	 
> 	If you are just starting, a slow PC is still workable.  You will
> generate the complete set of files for the DesignDays simulation and get
> the feel of running the simulation and study the results.  You can read
> the PDF document files and print the relavent topics with a slow PC.  
> 	 
> 	EPlus will run from WIndows'98SE  to Windows Vista, PC OS.
> 	 
> 	Dr. Li
> 	
> 	
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 	From: leeed2001@...
> 	Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:35:45 -0600
> 	Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] E+ System Requirements
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	I don't know that there is a hard set of requirements or
> recommendations, but here is my experience:
> 	
> 	For running single simulations at a time, my 3 yr old laptop w/
> 1.66GHz single core processor and 1GB RAM runs just fine.
> 	My work laptop where I constantly run dual simulations
> concurrently has a dual core processor and 3GB RAM and does quite nice
> for me.
> 	
> 	I think it is fair to say that E+ won't be affected by the
> graphics engine, as it is solely a command line engine.  However, if you
> are going to run a GUI such as DesignBuilder than you may want to look
> at the specific GUI recommendations.
> 	
> 	Edwin
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:19 PM, pohkhai84 <ng_khai@...
> <mailto:ng_khai@...> > wrote:
> 	
> 
> 		Dear All,
> 		
> 		I am intending to download E+ and learn it to do some
> energy 
> 		simulations. Before I download into my computer, is
> there any where I 
> 		can find the minimum system requirement that is required
> in order for 
> 		E+ to run smoothly (ie. CPU speed, ram, graphics,
> etc)... I am hoping 
> 		that my laptop of 3 years is able to run E+ smoothly. If
> not, I might 
> 		have to rely on my desktop at home instead.
> 		
> 		Thanks! :)
> 		
> 		
> 		
> 
> 		
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> ________________________________
> 
> 	Visit messengerbuddies.ca to find out how you could win. Enter
> today. <http://www.messengerbuddies.ca/?ocid=BUDDYOMATICENCA20>
>



------------------------------------

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/