Dear Chris (and others),
I am bogging down a bit because it sounds as though
(to paraphrase) "You can't give E+ a data set that simply and reasonably
represents the solar impact that actually occurred for a specific time
period."
Since sky cover is reported in many weather data sets,
what if I just gave the actual % sky cover to E+ in a custom data set? As
mentioned in my first post, my (perhaps simplistic) assumption is that the sun
does the same thing every day, but the clouds vary a lot. How can we
represent that factor simply to E+? If I did that, is there some other
factor that renders it meaningless?
Since the sun has a big impact on many building designs, I
want to reflect it's impact on HVAC and overall energy use.
I'm trying to get a "reasonable and defensible" approach, not "precise to
several decimal places".
Thanks again!
The Building Performance
Team
|