[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[EnergyPlus_Support] Why cannot Energeplus replace DOE2 in the field?
- To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Why cannot Energeplus replace DOE2 in the field?
- From: "noul123" <noul123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:07:16 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:08:19 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1251680898; bh=XhlV8kiawLDO1rddxDe2s86nx+6kdt7YXjC0HzshAGo=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PiUeTaYRzsCCkqTSy1kVeQiko9byV/Nt+T2uDWaPhIgx+YNfHIWu0TBvh0GsN98UgnlbWc3blyb6KTLffSXYBKGO+v+LjI44LKLlFRcSJZMu7sYERwPGxARitBW3dH4g
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=UeZGkuodFOHOxadrxh/KuAjU4rLferqScuVhlZTJCOM4xnrSkZT9Zy8v/KlS9+bEkzaWMn2hj5yTiDwADdd/bKCUGyf7cS6ShLzECGw9HAYvoV3hE9HggqqmxiPVd3PU;
- Envelope-to: linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: <EnergyPlus_Support.yahoogroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; contact EnergyPlus_Support-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Hi, guys.
This is very fundamental question, but it is very important for
me.
When I learned energy simulations in my school several years ago, my professor said E+ would replace DOE2 like VisulaDOE, PowerDOE and Equest etc in the near future. So I decided to focus on E+ with my thesis topic for my Ph.D period.
However, DOE2 is still main steam in the field, and Eplus just supports DOEs for the cases that DOE cannot solve and is used for
research purposes.
What do you think the reason that E+ have not replace DOE2 now?
I also met many problems when I used Eplus for my work, so i also have my opinions of the problem of Eplus.
The first reason that I thought as the disadvantage of Eplus is
its stability. Sometimes inside air temperature of a models go to 100 C due to stability problem of Eplus.
Other problems is its complexity to use. It is related to pre- and post-processor program issue. It is relatively more uncomfortable to use than EQEST and VisualDOE etc.
I tried to overcome the problem of Eplus for my thesis.
What's your opinion of other problems of Eplus? Is it impossible to
replace Eplus to DOE2 ? For doing that, what is necessary for Eplus?
Thanks.
------------------------------------
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/