That output variable would be “System Node Temp.” But if this about eliminating coil warnings, then some of them are for the condenser side. So a really robust EMS program might look at both the outdoor air and the coil inlet.
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jia Hu
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 10:01 AM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Learn from my mistakes - EMS to avoid DX coil freeze - bad implementation
Thanks, do you know how to implement your method? specifically, which variable should I use to in the EMS:Sensor? or which variable is used to measure DX coil inlet node ?
Thanks,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jean marais <jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yip, ideally each coil...that's a lot of work, but I think soon eplus will work coil freeze protection into the coil model. I'm monitoring just one worst case coil at the moment in one of my models and applying the manipulated schedule to all coils as a "less work" work around. Should do the job though.
__._,_.___
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___