Of course I look at the detailed results. The blind is outside the window. What surprises me is that the hourly results from "Window Transmitted Beam Solar" are higher due to te BlockBeamSolar function. I would expect that this value should be lower as a result from the optimal slat angle. I've simulated a dozen variants, each time with a different default angle and different min and max angle. With a fixed angle I have 67 kWh/m² cooling load. Every other simulation with the BlockBeamSolar function gives me results between 84 and 92 kWh/m². Geert Van: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens YuanLu Li I think you are one of those user who does not look at the detailed timestep values. To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Using blockbeamsolar to simulate a sun protection automatically moving with the angle of the sun, I get strange results. __._,_.___ Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |