All,
Thanks for all your kindly reply.
James, I used your method to set the pumps. I used 18m/23m head with 60%&65% total pump efficiency and got the results below.
It is still not match 349kW/1000L/s and 301kW/1000L/s.
Is the “Power” (in the red) the motor input power? Or the pump mechanical efficiency is not 0.78?
Have you checked baseline pump power in your model before? I am not very confident about my setting.
Thanks!
Type | Control | Head [pa] | Water Flow [m3/s] | Electric Power [W] | Power Per Water Flow Rate [W-s/m3] | Motor Efficiency [W/W] | |
CHW LOOP CHW SECONDARY PUMP | HeaderedPumps:VariableSpeed | Intermittent | 150400.00 | 0.3913 | 90567.40 | 231477.21 | 0.83 |
HW LOOP HW SUPPLY PUMP | Pump:VariableSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1824 | 53594.26 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
CHILLER1 CHW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 75000.00 | 0.0810 | 9349.89 | 115430.79 | 0.83 |
CHILLER2 CHW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 75000.00 | 0.0810 | 9349.89 | 115430.79 | 0.83 |
CHILLER3 CHW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 75000.00 | 0.0810 | 9349.89 | 115430.79 | 0.83 |
CHILLER4 CHW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 75000.00 | 0.0810 | 9349.89 | 115430.79 | 0.83 |
CHILLER5 CHW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 75000.00 | 0.0810 | 9349.89 | 115430.79 | 0.83 |
CW TOWER1 CNDW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1090 | 32034.86 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
CW TOWER2 CNDW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1090 | 32034.86 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
CW TOWER3 CNDW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1090 | 32034.86 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
CW TOWER4 CNDW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1090 | 32034.86 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
CW TOWER5 CNDW BRANCH PUMP | Pump:ConstantSpeed | Intermittent | 176515.00 | 0.1090 | 32034.86 | 293897.77 | 0.77 |
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Dirkes
Sent: 2013年5月6日 9:30
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Question about how to set 90.1 baseline pump in Energyplus
Patrick,
I’m not sure I completely understand your question, but�.
· ASHRAE’s math works properly to produce either 22 or 19W / gpm
· ASHRAE seems to think that it is common to have combined motor + impeller efficiency of 60%, and I think that is reasonable as well
· The selection of 75 feet or 60 feet of head for those different systems is a judgment call, I think
o You can certainly argue that condenser water systems are generally shorter and have less overall head
o Similarly chilled water systems are longer, have more coil rows, etc.
o Hot water systems are normally of similar length to chilled water, but have less coil rows and heat exchanger tubes
· So, overall, I think ASHRAE’s goal was to reflect a typical “pretty good” pumping system design for the Baseline pump power limitations.
Does that help?
James V Dirkes II, PE, BEMP, LEED AP
www.buildingperformanceteam.com
Energy Analysis, Commissioning & Training Services
1631 Acacia Drive, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
616 450 8653
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of patrick_bivona
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 11:11 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Question about how to set 90.1 baseline pump in Energyplus
Jim,
Slightly sidetracking from Jenny's question but... ASHRAE 90.1-2004 User's Manual says that 22 W/gpm corresponds to a 75 ft head with a 60% motor and impeller efficiency. Using the same equation as you (which I'm usually using), I get a 70.1 ft head.
The User's Manual also says that 19 W/gpm translated to a 60 ft head with a 60% combined efficiency.
75/22 = 3.41
60/19 = 3.16
Their relationship between head and power/flow (at constant efficiency) does not seem to be linear. Any idea how they calculated that?
Thanks,
Patrick
--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jim Dirkes <jim@...> wrote:
>
> Jenny,
> Your question #2:
> I think E+ follows much the same logic as you describe for eQuest. It is also easy to test by using different values of motor efficiency to find the resulting power.
> The method below shows a derivation for US (IP) units of the necessary pump pressure rise to satisfy ASHRAE 90.1. You will notice in the very last line that it assumes 100% motor efficiency. This is not the case for any motor, but you can easily adjust the formulae for the actual motor efficiency.
>
>
>
> Pump Power (90.1 Limitation)
>
> US measure:
>
> Watts =
>
> GPM x
>
> DeltaP x
>
> 746
>
>
> 3962 x
>
> ç
>
>
> Watts =
>
> 746
>
> x
>
> DeltaP
>
> GPM
>
> 3962
>
> ç
>
>
>
> Assuming ç =
>
> 0.78
>
>
> Watts =
>
> 746
>
> x
>
> DeltaP
>
> GPM
>
> 3962
>
> 0.78
>
>
> =
>
> 0.2414
>
> x
>
> DeltaP
>
>
>
>
> Therefore, if desired W / GPM = 'x' (and ç = 0.78 x 1.00)
>
> - Chilled water; ASHRAE 90.1 baseline
>
> DeltaP =
>
> 22
>
> =
>
> 91.1
>
> ft. H2O
>
>
> 0.2414
>
>
> =
>
> 272,420
>
> Pa (Use this for ASHRAE 90.1 Baseline)
>
>
> Similarly, for Heating and condenser pumps
>
> DeltaP =
>
> 19
>
> =
>
> 78.7
>
> ft. H2O
>
>
> 0.2414
>
>
> =
>
> 235,270
>
> Pa (Use this for ASHRAE 90.1 Baseline)
>
>
> Note:
>
> E+ assumes a pump mechanical efficiency of 0.78. For this derivation to remain correct, use a motor efficiency of 1.00
>
>
>
>
> James V Dirkes II, PE, BEMP, LEED AP
> www.buildingperformanceteam.com<http://www.buildingperformanceteam.com/>
> Energy Analysis, Commissioning & Training Services
> 1631 Acacia Drive, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
> 616 450 8653
>
> From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jenny Zhang
> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 5:46 AM
> To: 'EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Question about how to set 90.1 baseline pump in Energyplus
>
>
> Hi All friends
> I have questions about how to set 90.1 baseline pumps in E+
>
>
> 1) The condense water pumps
>
> 90.1 G3.1.3.11 states that Each chiller shall be modeled with separate condenser water and chilled-water pumps interlocked to operate with the associated chiller.
>
> For chilled water pumps it is easy to solved, because we could set CHW pumps in each chiller chilled water branch and of course the chilled water pump will run only the chiller run; but for condenser water pumps I face the problem that I could put cw pumps in chiller condenser water-side branch.
>
> Does E+ requires condenser water pumps to be put only on the condenser water branch?
>
> I think there is two way to do the setting: (1) set headed pumps in the cw supply side branch or (2) set more than one cw tower(same as chiller nos) and for each cw tower put a condenser water pump in the branch.
>
> Which is better? Or Do you have other method?
>
>
>
> 2) Pump power
>
> 90.1requries pump power for chilled water/hot water/condenser water pumps. How to set it? In eQuest usually I use pump head & total efficiency to ensure the power/flow rate(such as 75ft&65% =22W/gpm),
>
> But in E+ I find it difficult to do the same setting. Only motor efficiency can be input, and how about pump efficiency? Is it 78%, I find in the EngineeringReference.pdf "The motor efficiency is an input. Since we need the total efficiency to calculate the nominal power consumption we assume an impeller efficiency of 0,78 for purposes of sizing". Does it means that the total efficiency is motor efficiency* 0.78 or we can use "Fraction of motor inefficiencies to fluid stream" to control the total efficiency? I really confused.
>
>
> [cid:image001.png@...]
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Jenny Zhang
> Assistant Engineer | Building Sustainability
>
> Arup
> 39/F-41/F Huaihai Plaza 1045 Huaihai Road (M), Shanghai 200031, China
> t +86 21 3118 8888 d +86 21 3118 8750
> f +86 21 3118 8882
> www.arup.com<http://www.arup.com/>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup business
> systems are scanned for acceptability of content and viruses
>
__._,_.___
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___