I don't think the time has been shifted by an hour, but it's just a difference in how hours are reported. 0:00 - 1:00 is the first hour == Hour 1 1:00 - 2:00 is the second hour == Hour 2 etc. However, your question about the effect of the time offset on the solar calculations is very pertinent, and something that has been largely overlooked or ignored. As used in EnergyPlus, time offset means the difference in time from UTC (formerly called GMT or Greenwich Mean Time). This is only relevant when the raw weather data is reported in UTC. If you're using data recorded in local standard time, which is almost always true, you don't need to worry. However, you should worry about a different time offset which has to do with how the solar radiation is reported and the solar position calculated in simulation programs like EnergyPlus. In North America, the convention is to do both over the preceding hour, i.e., the solar radiation on a TMY and IWEC weather file would be from -1:00 to 0:00, and the solar position calculated by EnergyPlus at -0:30 from the time stamp. Outside of North America, i.e., Europe, Australia, Japan, etc., the convention is to do both from -0:30 to +0:30 of the hour, i.e., the solar radiation on a European weather file would be from -0:30 to +0:30 and the solar position calculated at 0:00. Therefore, when one is using such a weather file with EnergyPlus, there will be a 30 minute mismatch between the solar radiation on the file and the sun position calculated by EnergyPlus. Now, some may think this is insignificant, but it will produce wierd results, especially at sunrise hours where there could be no solar when the sun is above the horizon and vice-versa, at sunset hours where there could be solar when the sun is entirely below the horizon. There can also be a noticeable dissymmetry in the solar on the east versus the west facade. Therefore, I suggest that you determine the convention used in the raw data file that you have, and if it originated in Europe there's a very high probability that it's from -0:30 to +0:30 and not from -1:00 to 0:00. And if so, what can you do about it in your simulations? I've suggested to the EnergyPlus Development Team several years back that they add a new input variable for SOLAR-OFFSET, but I'm doubtful this was ever done. Until that happens, the easiest way to correct for this "Solar Offset" is simply to shift the building longitude west by 7.5 degrees. As a final note on this matter to all users, I have only spot checks, but I'm quite certain that most if not all of the weather files on the EnergyPlus Weather web site of non-North American origin follow the second, i.e., non-North American, convention in reporting their solar radiation. Note that the main determinant is not the location, but the authorship of the weather file. IWEC and SWERA files were produced in the US and thus use the North American convention. Joe Joe Huang White Box Technologies, Inc. 346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A Moraga CA 94556 yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data (o) (925)388-0265 (c) (510)928-2683 "building energy simulations at your fingertips" On 12/3/2015 4:46 AM, la.epfl@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
__._,_.___ Posted by: Joe Huang <yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button. __,_._,___ |