[Equest-users] Number of systems required by 90.1?

James Hansen JHANSEN at ghtltd.com
Wed Dec 10 08:40:00 PST 2008

I'm working on a model of a 5-story building - my Proposed system is
floor-by-floor chilled water AHUs connected to a water-cooled chiller
central plan.  Airside is shutoff VAV boxes with hot water reheat.


For the size of the building, the baseline model is almost identical.
It is System 7 - Packaged rooftop VAV system with reheat boxes, chilled
water, hot water boilers.


My question is whether or not the Baseline model has to have a single
system for the building, or should it have 5 separate RTUs (doesn't
really make any sense) since my proposed building has 5 systems?


I'm pretty sure the answer is that the Baseline should just have one
packaged RTU for the building, but it actually makes a big difference on
energy use.  By breaking the systems down into one-per-floor, as is the
case with the proposed model, I end up saving a LOT of energy, possibly
because the 1st floor is slab-on-grade, and the 5th floor has a roof. 


Just wanted to make sure I have the correct number of "systems" for the
Baseline model.




GHT Limited
James Hansen, PE, LEED AP

Senior Associate

1010 N. Glebe Rd, Suite 200

Arlington, VA  22201-4749

703-338-5754 (Cell)

703-243-1200 (Office)

703-276-1376 (Fax)

www.ghtltd.com <http://www.ghtltd.com/> 

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee.  It is the property of GHT Limited.  Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to ght at ghtltd.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.  Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20081210/25f0e84a/attachment.htm>

More information about the Equest-users mailing list