[Equest-users] Heating Hours Unmet
Nisonger, Kyle M NWK
Kyle.M.Nisonger at usace.army.mil
Mon Sep 14 12:33:38 PDT 2009
John,
I've attached the two files you requested, but I don't think they are
necessary because my parametric runs only incorporate rotating the building
to meet LEED.
Thanks for your help, sorry for the confusion.
Kyle Nisonger
Mechanical Engineer, LEED AP
US Army Corps of Engineers
Kansas City District
(816) 389-3224
-----Original Message-----
From: John Aulbach [mailto:jra_sac at yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 1:55 PM
To: Jeremy Poling; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org; Nisonger, Kyle M NWK
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Heating Hours Unmet
Kyle:
We need the.INP file, not the -2.INP file. It also appears with that, you are
running parametrics. We also then need the .PRD file as well.
John Aulbach
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, Nisonger, Kyle M NWK <Kyle.M.Nisonger at usace.army.mil>
wrote:
From: Nisonger, Kyle M NWK <Kyle.M.Nisonger at usace.army.mil>
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Heating Hours Unmet
To: "Jeremy Poling" <jpoling at epsteinglobal.com>,
equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 8:42 AM
I have assigned each zone it's own single zone system, but I still am
coming
up with about the same number of unmet hours. I can manually adjust
the
design cfm to lower them, but this seems futile trying to play around
with it
to get it just right. Shouldn't eQuest automatically size the equip.
and
cfm's to meet the load? Another question I have is why doesn't the
percent
of hours outside of the throttling range on the BEPS report match up
with the
number of unmet hours on the SS-R report? I have attached my project
files
if anyone has time to look at them. I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Kyle Nisonger
Mechanical Engineer, LEED AP
US Army Corps of Engineers
Kansas City District
(816) 389-3224
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Poling [mailto:jpoling at epsteinglobal.com
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=jpoling@epsteinglobal.com> ]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 11:43 PM
To: Nisonger, Kyle M NWK; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=equest-users@lists.onebuilding.
org>
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Heating Hours Unmet
Kyle,
Try this first: eQuest expects a single-zone system to serve just
that - a
single zone. You'll need to have a separate single zone system
created for
each zone you need to assign to that system. Once that is done,
eQuest will
then be able to address the thermostats in each zone adequately and
you
should see a rather dramatic drop in your unmet heating hours,
possibly
eliminating them altogether.
After that, if unmet heating hours remain there are a number of other
things
to look at. Let us know if the above works first.
JEREMY R. POLING, PE, LEED AP
Senior Sustainability Analyst
Strategic Services
Site Solutions | Operations | Sustainability
EPSTEIN
Epstein is a firm believer in sustainability. We ask that you please
consider
the environment before printing this e-mail.
________________________________
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=equest-users-bounces@lists.oneb
uilding.org>
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=equest-users-bounces@lists.oneb
uilding.org> ] On Behalf Of Nisonger,
Kyle M NWK
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:11 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=equest-users@lists.onebuilding.
org>
Subject: [Equest-users] Heating Hours Unmet
Equesters,
I have a packaged single zone system using DX cooling and Furnace
heating
that serves 7 different zones and is controlled by the corridor zone.
This
is supposed to replicate "System 3" in ASHRAE 90.1 appendix G. I
have many
unmet heating hours (including my system control zone). I have let
eQuest
auto size equipment capacities and and cfm. I have tried doing
everything I
can think of to reduce the number of unmet hours. My OA volumes are
pretty
small and shouldn't be affecting it. I expected possibly a few unmet
hours
in some of the zones, but not in my control zone, the corridor, and
not to
this magnitude. I get the following warning message seen below, I'm
not
sure what it means by "Baseboard-Rating"? Any ideas on what this
means or
how I could reduce the number of unmet heating hours?
**WARNING********************************************************************
**
ZONE EL1 Food Storage Zn (G.S2)
might have insufficient heating capability.
Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE
load
(see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)
Thanks for your help,
Kyle Nisonger
Mechanical Engineer, LEED(r) AP
US Army Corps of Engineers
Kansas City District
(816) 389-3224
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
<http://us.mc528.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUI
LDING.ORG>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LWood Dog Kennel B, Baseline - Baseline Design.inp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 92097 bytes
Desc: LWood Dog Kennel B, Baseline - Baseline Design.inp
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090914/dd819993/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LWood Dog Kennel B, Baseline.prd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: LWood Dog Kennel B, Baseline.prd
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090914/dd819993/attachment-0005.obj>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list