[Equest-users] Studio Lighting
Dakota Kelley
dakotak at teliospc.com
Wed Jun 30 12:17:26 PDT 2010
They’re separate space types; one’s for the seating area, the other is for the lobby. Also take a look at 90.1-2007 Section 9.2.2.3, exceptions “m” and “n”. This type of lighting is non-regulated, so it should be the same in both models. The last time I modeled a performing arts theater, I modeled the production lights as task lighting with a separate schedule to separate the lighting end-use. I used the same production light power in both models, and then for ambient lighting, I used the space-by-space method with the two aforementioned theater space types. There were no comments from the LEED reviewer on this approach.
DAKOTA KELLEY
Project Designer | Energy Analyst
Office: 214.744.6199
Cell: 214.280.3825
Fax: 214.744.0770
http://www.teliospc.com <http://www.teliospc.com/> 3535 Travis St. Suite 115
dakotak at teliospc.com Dallas, TX 75204
| MEP ENGINEERING · ENERGY MODELING · LEED CONSULTATION · COMMISSIONING |
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed,
And may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, please email the sender immediately, and delete this email from all computers. Any
distribution or other use is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 2009 Telios Corporation.
From: Sami, Vikram [mailto:Vikram.Sami at perkinswill.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:34 AM
To: Harakhlaal; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Studio Lighting
Table 9.6.1 in ASHRAE 90.1-2007 lists the standard for performing Arts theater twice (curious). The higher of the two is 3.3 w/ft2 - the lower is 2.6 w/ft2.
5.0 seems excessively high.
Vikram Sami, LEED AP
Sustainable Design Analyst
1382 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30309
t: 404-443-7462 f: 404.892.5823 e: vikram.sami at perkinswill.com www.perkinswill.com <http://www.perkinswill.com/>
Perkins+Will. Ideas + buildings that honor the broader goals of society
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Harakhlaal
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:07 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Studio Lighting
Re Process Loads Studio Lighting
This is sort of a less common building typology, but for theaters, performance and television studios, any way to claim an LPD that more closely matches the design performance requirements? For example, if television studio lights result in 5.0 w/sf, an office baseline of 1.1 w/sf would not help the results. Any way to say that, i.e. typical studio lights would be 6.0 w/sf, and we are using 5.0 w/sf, so there is a savings?
Just curious. Thanks everyone.
Harakhlaal
Energy Engineer
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy, or alter this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100630/f120c112/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 3170 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100630/f120c112/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2143 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100630/f120c112/attachment-0002.jpeg>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list