[Equest-users] Baseline Building HVAC system

[Rob Hudson]

thanks, everyone, for the input.  solution = VAV system

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Carol Gardner <cmg750 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, yeah, you did say 32,000 sf total, didn't you. I'd go with Timothy
> then.
>
> Carol
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Rob Hudson <rdh4176 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That is what my original thought was, but if the below grade floor (total
>> of 7100 sqft) is disregarded, then it drops into the PSZ catagory and out of
>> the VAV catagory.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Carol Gardner <cmg750 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> Assuming you are looking at Table G3.1.1A in Standard 90 the key would be
>>> in the use of the word AND: 3 stories or less AND less than 25,000 sf for
>>> PSZ vs 5 stories or less AND between 25,000 and 100,000 sf for VAV. So I
>>> think you should use VAV and that the below grade floor doesn't even come
>>> into play.
>>>
>>> Others?
>>>
>>> Carol
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Rob Hudson <rdh4176 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have an office building that i am modeling that has 3 above ground
>>>> floors and one below ground floor.  the total square footage is 32,000.
>>>> would this qualify as a VAV for the baseline or a single zone constant
>>>> volume?
>>>> The below ground floor is the part that is making me have second
>>>> thoughts.  my first thought was VAV, but i figured i would pose the question
>>>> to get some healthy conversion.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rob Hudson
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Equest-users mailing list
>>>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
>>>> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Hudson
>>
>
>


-- 
Rob Hudson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100329/097f5e8d/attachment-0002.htm>