[Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
Gregory Sarkisian, P.E.
greg at sarkassoc.com
Thu May 27 12:59:24 PDT 2010
I think those that care to hire her as a consultant or helper should do so offline between themselves. Otherwise those of us who either don’t have the need, or cannot afford it will go on using this free forum.
Gregory Sarkisian, P.E.
President
P: 888-393-1470
F: 888-428-4492
www.sarkassoc.com <http://www.sarkassoc.com/>
From: Diep, Tu [mailto:tdiep at aeieng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:00 PM
To: eQUEST Users List
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
Entertaining discussion going on. Anyone trying to ask California for money is insane (jokingly). There is better chance of winning the lottery than getting a dime from this great state. California is pretty much broke and its not a pretty site here for all the civil servants.
Back to the topic at hand, we live in a capitalistic society and anyone should be able to offer advice/knowledge for whatever price the market will bear. For example, the California building codes are public domain information (If you want them, go here-àhttp://resource.org/bsc.ca.gov/index.html). I am involved on a project where the client elected to solicit the services of a code consultant. My view is this example mimics the eQuest situation everyone is talking about. Which btw is also a public domain tool.
A previous post mentioned they were willing to pay $125/hr for eQuest advice. I know for a fact, the code consultant’s billing rate is more than $125/hr (which in CA may be just enough income to buy a house, again joking). Maybe the codes in CA are confusing enough that we need additional consultants to agree on what is code compliant and what is not. Who knows…point being the client was willing to pay a premium for this service. From the clients perspective, It brings value to a project knowing there is an expert on board. Same thing with the idea of consulting eQuest related issues, it can bring great value to a project to have someone well-versed to assist in the energy modeling.
Thank You,
Tu Diep, P.E. LEED AP BD+C
Affiliated Engineers, Inc.
2700 Ygnacio Valley Road, #170 | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | phone 925-933-8400 ext. 204 | fax 925-933-8401 I tdiep at aeieng.com
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Paul Riemer
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:19 PM
To: eQUEST Users List
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
I write with all of the onebuilding.org lists in mind. If they survive, the onebuilding.org admin can publish and enforce.
I assert that the lists have to stay non-commercial with no money changing hands for any activity on it. Any convoluted attempt otherwise is absurd.
Whoever wants to perform modeling related services for a fee should do so, off of the lists. Best wishes in those endeavors.
Then we just need a few rules about the intersection, I propose:
1) If you post a request to the list you are assumed to be open to free advice and offers of fee based services unless you state otherwise.
2) Those responding to requests with offers of fee based services must do so off of the list, direct to the individual.
3) Individuals who offer fee based services but are legitimately posting to the discussion are allowed a signature line note to that effect like
"Offering modeling review and support services at ... "
4) Posting to list looking for project work is prohibited or constrained (e.g. 1 per quarter).
Paul Riemer
Dunham
P.S. If you are really good at DOE-2 and want to work reviewing and supporting other modelers, I may know just the opportunity for you....for the right price :).
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Gordon D. Schweitzer
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:27 PM
To: Haynes, Glenn; Dakota Kelley; Carol Gardner; eQUEST Users List
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
All,
I sent an email to Carol but thought I would jump on the bandwagon...
>From my understanding, eQUEST is funded through the California government, through grants etc. Would an "eQUEST help desk" grant be an option for receiving funding to do what you are doing? Also, I agree that If this "help desk" was made available, I do not think the listserv would be necessary/used. For example, I am also a member of the TRACE listserve, but receive very few emails, if any, as a member (because there is a paid support staff).
Once individuals would need to pay to get answers to more "complex" questions, this "free" software no longer becomes free. At that point, would it be more useful/cost effective to switch to Trace or Hap who have dedicated (and paid) support staff that answer questions for free (as part of the "seat" cost)?
Thanks to everyone for their contributions,
Gordon
Gordon D. Schweitzer III, LEED AP BD+C
Mechanical Engineer
Heapy Engineering
A LEED-NC SILVER CERTIFIED FACILITY
1400 West Dorothy Lane
Dayton, OH 45409-1310
Phone: (937) 224-0861
FAX: (937) 224-5777
www.heapy.com <http://www.heapy.com/>
_____
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Haynes, Glenn
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 4:03 PM
To: Dakota Kelley; Carol Gardner; eQUEST Users List
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
I do not have a strong opinion on this issue because it offers a service not currently available. But to me the issue is one of effect on the whole eQuest community. My fear is that once this service is offered, many who have spent their valuable time offering free advice will tend to back off and let the paid services take up the slack. This will probably reduce the usefulness of the current list and leave small firms and individuals without extra cash out. This may eventually reduce or destroy the value of the free list service. The future of DOE2 and eQuest depends on young beginners who currently have little money and need the free help.
This list is one of the few truly valuable free services available in the world today. It provides a forum for old codgers like me to mentor those younger and less experienced (those who need help the most and can afford it the least), and, currently, I am in good company.
Glenn
_____
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Dakota Kelley
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:14 PM
To: Carol Gardner; eQUEST Users List
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
Carol,
Let me cut through the philosophical stuff and set a starting bid: were I to find myself in need, I would pay $125/hr for one-on-one, pay-per-use, phone/WebEx-style assistance, billed in 0.25 hr increments or each fraction thereof, with a minimum charge of 0.5 hrs. This assumes the person providing the help has both a mechanical engineering degree and years of eQUEST experience, which appears to fit your description. If Portland has not eliminated your Canadian accent, I would gladly pay aboot $126/hr..what’s another loonie, eh? Naturally, there would be a high expectation that you should be able to solve nearly any issue somewhat quickly, and you would have to determine how you want to handle issues you are unable to resolve. However, I have no qualms about charging or paying for one-on-one help…it’s called “consulting”. In my early days I posted a couple questions and received no responses – I could’ve just as easily been talking to my HP DeskJet while printing “I hope that helps” messages to myself. Having an alternate, fee-based help resource would have been a blessing.
If I may enter the philosophical arena for a minute, I’m amazed by the eQUEST users who will comfortably charge their clients thousands of dollars for a model, using “free” software, but expect free assistance and get up in arms when anyone brings up the idea of fee-based help (or that it would be brought up on a forum created for eQUEST help). There has been talk about helping for “the greater good of the modeling community”, but I don’t find it to be intellectually honest. Such a notion is predicated on an equal contribution from all participants, but the reality is that there are far more help-seekers than help-providers, and such will always be the case with voluntary forums. Quick questions that can be answered in five minutes are not an issue, and the forum is wonderful for that, but when it turns into me taking an hour or two to go through someone’s model for free, while they get paid for my findings, is not inherently good for me or the community. It has been done for me in the past, and I have paid it forward. However, there are not enough active participants to make this standard operating procedure. I also refute the notion that having an alternate help source undermines the forum; the two are not mutually exclusive.
So, Carol, please put out your shingle. I might break my model just for an excuse to call you.
DAKOTA KELLEY
Project Designer
Office: 214-744-6199
Cell: 214-280-3825
Fax: 214-744-0770
http://www.teliospc.com <http://www.teliospc.com/> 3535 Travis St. Suite 115
dakotak at teliospc.com Dallas, TX 75204
| MEP ENGINEERING · ENERGY MODELING · LEED CONSULTATION · COMMISSIONING |
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed,
And may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, please email the sender immediately, and delete this email from all computers. Any
distribution or other use is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 2010 Telios Corporation.
From: Carol Gardner [mailto:cmg750 at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:45 PM
To: eQUEST Users List
Cc: Benville, Jim; ed.wall at ee.doe.gov
Subject: [Equest-users] eQUEST Help Desk Funding
All,
For the right amount of money, a dedicated land line, and a dedicated computer, I will function as your dedicated Help Desk. Let me know who is interested in funding me to be this resource. Let me know how much you think this resource is worth. As you all know by now unless you've been sleeping, I am a self-employed professional that takes time to answer your questions but must quit giving my time away for free.
--
Carol Gardner PE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100527/591d0374/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 182 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100527/591d0374/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 7245 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100527/591d0374/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2327 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100527/591d0374/attachment-0002.jpeg>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list