[Equest-users] app g economizer

[Dahlstrom, Aaron]

A simple Q -

Does everyone agree that the App G baseline building is supposed to have an air-side economizer (in the mentioned climates)?

There are some buildings where architectural choices make it difficult to accommodate an air-side economizer.

Nonetheless, Section G3.1.2.6 appears to require modeling specifically an air-side economizer for the baseline

I am thinking it could be a bit ambiguous depending on what you think "outdoor air economizer" means.

Has anyone seen interpretations clarifying this one way or the other?
Or submitted a CIR to allow water-side economizers in the baseline where that is the industry standard for the building type?

THANKS,

Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED(r) AP
In Posse - A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753| m: 267-507-5470| In Posse: 215-282-6800| AKF: 215-735-7290
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>





This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110415/61061e51/attachment.htm>