[Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

[Paul Riemer]

I agree it is not trivial but I am really surprised by that 50.8% number.  I think the curves are relatively similar at the high end and most systems rarely spend time on the low end where the curves do differ considerably.  Is there a big difference in the system volumes, specifically are the baseline fans bigger in volume and thus always operating at a lower ratio than the proposed?

Generally, I assume that the curve in 90.1 was supposed to represent a VAV VFD curve and that my VAV VFD fans should not be penalized against it.  VAV vs. CAV is trickier and brings the temptation to switch your rationale based on which side your project falls on.

Paul Riemer, PE, LEED AP BD+C
DUNHAM

From: Bishop, Bill [mailto:wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:07 PM
To: Nick Caton; Paul Riemer; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

Nick's concern about VAV fan curves is not trivial. I am working on a LEED model using Baseline System 5 (PVAV). The Baseline fan energy using the 90.1 G3.1.3.15 VAV FPLR curve is 50.8% more than the fan energy using the default eQUEST "Variable Speed Drive FPLR" curve. YMMV of course but that is a big difference. This penalizes the Baseline for my project - the total electrical use increases 8.9% in the Baseline vs. only a 4.1% increase in the Proposed model when switching to the same G3.1.3.15 curve.

Bill

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Paul Riemer; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Paul & others:

I just wanted to say off the bat:  the EDR resource Paul linked us looks to address the heart of my query directly (and thank you so much!), but it's difficult for me to summarize further right now...

I think I'll need to re-read the appropriate parts of this document a few times over and arrive at a deeper understanding of actual methods/sequencing strategies for static pressure reset before I come to any definite conclusions regarding VAV fan curve.

The query I'm trying to nail down is what assumptions and specific system behaviors the DOE2 library/default curves and particularly the prescribed 90.1-2007 baseline curve represent, and from there answer what's fair game insofar as defining/modifying a different sort of EIR-FPLR curve for a proposed model.  I have the understanding that the associated fan energy savings between various approaches are potentially big and real, but I'm scratching the surface of how to actually model it to a realistic degree.

If anyone has pondered the same topic or is a few strides ahead of me and wishes to share any thoughts/guidance, please do not hesitate =).

~Nick

[cid:image002.jpg at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036
fax 913.345.0617
www.smithboucher.com

From: Paul Riemer [mailto:Paul.Riemer at dunhameng.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 7:21 AM
To: 'Dahlstrom, Aaron'; Nick Caton; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

As for fans I suggest two resources:
Advanced Variable Air Volume VAV System Design Guide<http://www.energydesignresources.com/media/2651/EDR_DesignGuidelines_VAV.pdf> by Energy Design Resources has some good discussion and suggested fan curves.

Reid Hart of PECI did a presentation to BSUG on September 16, 2009 on fan curves and static pressure reset.    BSUG posted their items, including this one, to their yahoo group at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BSUG/files/. BSUG has morphed into BESF and has a new home at http://energytrust.org/business/building-energy-simulation/.

Paul Riemer, PE, LEED AP BD+C
DUNHAM

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Dahlstrom, Aaron
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 12:03 AM
To: Nick Caton; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Nick -

We're in the midst of asking the same questions about the Pump-Power-fFlow equations.

I imagine in both types of flow networks there may some fixed pressure drops that won't be reduced:

1)      Min static pressure across flow control devices (VAV boxes, water control valves)

2)      Static pressure in critical branches that may not be at reduced flow, even though the overall flow network is at reduced flow

3)      In staged plants, static pressure across individual constant-volume plant components (eg in our case, chiller 1 of 6 always has 12 psig, regardless of whether it is the only chiller on or not)

With this mixture of fixed and variable pressure drops, I imagine multiple different power-versus-flow curves for the same building, depending on the physical location of the prime movers and the intervening pinch points / critical flow networks. 20000 cfm out of a peak 30000 cfm fan probably looks different in terms of power depending whether the majority is headed to west zones from an east mechanical room 400 ft away or headed to east zones just a few feet away.

Probably the most accurate method would be explicitly defining the flow network and calculating these pressure drops dynamically (if the modeler had the time to do that explicitly, or software cool enough (BIM?) to do it automatically). Anyone familiar enough with Energy Plus to know if that's a feature?

I guess no answers here, just more questions ...

Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED(r) AP
In Posse - A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753| m: 267-507-5470| In Posse: 215-282-6800| AKF: 215-735-7290
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com<mailto:ADahlstrom at in-posse.com> | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>



From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:08 PM
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Bill Bishop suggested a good clarification that I want to take on.  I've edited my language below (highlighted) to clarify the question I'm trying to pose.

~Nick

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]<mailto:[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]> On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:32 AM
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Hi everyone!

A recent discussion with a mechanical mentor brought up a question I'd like to share with the list...  If anyone has a partial or complete response I think we'd all benefit and appreciate it if you'd share your thoughts!

For a given duct distribution system, you've got a certain static drop.  At full flow, your supply fan also has to deal with a certain velocity pressure drop due to friction with the duct distribution.  If you reduce the supply airflow rate, you also lower the velocity and therefore the velocity pressure drops for the given duct distribution.  The net result is system supply fan has a lower total pressure drop to overcome, and so should operate more efficiently.

Does anyone know:  Whether we choose "variable speed" fan control, use the FAN-EIR-FPLR curve generated by the wizards, or use the VSD curve defined in 90.1 appendix G... are we simultaneously accounting for the efficiency gains due to lowered velocity pressure drop in addition to the drop in fan energy from lower RPMs?  If this is not accounted for inside/outside the fan curves, is there a direct way to define that or logically work it into the curves?

If it helps anyone answer, I can illustrate from recent checks that the wizard-generated FAN-EIR-FPLR curve has a "Nike Swoosh" shape with an inflection around the 20% mark.  This shape best matches the (limited) data I've seen for "real world" VSD input measurements.  Here's a screenshot:

[cid:image003.png at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

The following illustrates the 90.1-2007 VAV curve we're made to use for baseline systems 5-8 (I haven't checked to see if this still applies to 2010).  It does not have the same "inflection point" as zero is approached.  I think it's based on the fan law power equation or something similar that doesn't account for motor/VSD losses:

[cid:image004.png at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

The help files illustrate a different, third shape for "variable speed" control different from both of the above...

[cid:image005.png at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

Seeing these side-by-side raises another question for me regarding 90.1-2007 intent/practice... not specific to eQuest... but I've already spent too much of my time today writing this out!  Another day =)...

Thanks in advance for anyone joining in the discussion!

~Nick

[cid:image002.jpg at 01CC881C.C62E59D0]

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036
fax 913.345.0617
www.smithboucher.com


This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 22378 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13644 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12334 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 26587 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111011/dbbf52b8/attachment-0008.png>