[Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model (UNCLASSIFIED)
Eurek, John S NWO
John.S.Eurek at usace.army.mil
Tue Apr 17 07:32:30 PDT 2012
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
So LEED doesn't want to promote building built with strict air tightness?
Did the air tightness industry not pony up as much cash as the bike rack industry?
Our architects have been working on writing up an air tightness spec and researching best construction methods and air testing methods. I'll let them know they can stop.
John Eurek
-----Original Message-----
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jenny Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:34 AM
To: Jiao, Joey; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model
Joey, you are correct! I have receive comments from GBCI on a LEED EA project. The baseline model’s infiltration should be the same as the proposed model.
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jiao, Joey
Sent: 2012年4月16日 17:27
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model
Hi, Everyone:
Is there any request about baseline model’s infiltration?
I have check all appendix G items, but it seems this area is blank.
If the infiltration must be the same between baseline & purposed?
Any light on it will be appreciated.
Thank you.
Joey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joey Jiao
Graduate Engineer
Shanghai WSP Consulting Ltd. (Shenzhen Branch)
Room 406, Wan Tong Da Sha, 3002 Sun Gang Road East, Luo Hu, Shenzhen, 518023, PRC
Tel: +86 755 25860686
Fax: +86 755 25860680
Website: www.wspgroup.hk
We are WSP. United by our difference.
WSP is one of the world's fastest-growing design, engineering and management consultancies. Specialising in property, transport and environmental projects, we work with clients to create built and natural environments for the future.
CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail is confidential to the named recipient. If you have received a copy in error, please destroy it. You may not use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anyone, nor take copies of it. The only copies permitted are (1) by the named recipient and (2) for the purposes of completing successful electronic transmission to the named recipient and then only on the condition that these copies, with this notice attached, are kept confidential until destruction.
____________________________________________________________
Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup business
systems are scanned for acceptability of content and viruses
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list