[Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model (UNCLASSIFIED)

Eurek, John S NWO John.S.Eurek at usace.army.mil
Tue Apr 17 07:32:30 PDT 2012

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

So LEED doesn't want to promote building built with strict air tightness? 

Did the air tightness industry not pony up as much cash as the bike rack industry?

Our architects have been working on writing up an air tightness spec and researching best construction methods and air testing methods.  I'll let them know they can stop.

John Eurek

-----Original Message-----
From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jenny Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:34 AM
To: Jiao, Joey; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model

Joey, you are correct! I have receive comments from GBCI on a LEED EA project. The baseline model’s infiltration should be the same as the proposed model.



From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jiao, Joey
Sent: 2012年4月16日 17:27
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Infiltration of Baseline model


Hi, Everyone:

Is there any request about baseline model’s infiltration?

I have check all appendix G items, but it seems this area is blank.

If the infiltration must be the same between baseline & purposed?

Any light on it will be appreciated.


Thank you.






Joey Jiao

Graduate Engineer
Shanghai WSP Consulting Ltd. (Shenzhen Branch)

Room 406, Wan Tong Da Sha, 3002 Sun Gang Road East, Luo Hu, Shenzhen, 518023, PRC 

Tel:  +86 755 25860686 

Fax: +86 755 25860680 
Website: www.wspgroup.hk

We are WSP. United by our difference.

WSP is one of the world's fastest-growing design, engineering and management consultancies. Specialising in property, transport and environmental projects, we work with clients to create built and natural environments for the future.

This e-mail is confidential to the named recipient. If you have received a copy in error, please destroy it. You may not use or disclose the contents of this e-mail to anyone, nor take copies of it. The only copies permitted are (1) by the named recipient and (2) for the purposes of completing successful electronic transmission to the named recipient and then only on the condition that these copies, with this notice attached, are kept confidential until destruction. 


Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup  business
systems are scanned for acceptability of content and viruses

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

More information about the Equest-users mailing list