[Equest-users] GSHP Modelling - no. of wells

[R B]

Thanks for replying. I got the 5x8 configuration fromClimateMaster. They
generate non-listed configurations if you ask them.
-Rohini

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, David Eldridge <
DEldridge at grummanbutkus.com> wrote:

>  Not sure if anyone got back to you on this one - the limitation of the 4
> x 8 + 1 x 8 approach is that the two fields won’t interact, but it could be
> one way to approximate.  I forget which other configurations are available
> that might work better.****
>
> ** **
>
> You might use your suggested approach as the default, and then run a few
> different cases at the end to see what the sensitivity is to different
> field configurations.****
>
> ** **
>
> David****
>
> ** **
>
> *
> *****
>
>  ****
>
> David S. Eldridge, Jr., P.E., LEED AP BD+C, BEMP, BEAP, HBDP****
>
> *Grumman/Butkus Associates*****
>
> *
> *****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:
> equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf Of *R B
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 15, 2012 11:24 AM
> *To:* eQUEST Users List
> *Subject:* [Equest-users] GSHP Modelling - no. of wells****
>
> ** **
>
> I am modelling a well configuration that is 5x8 rectangular. The
> climatemaster add-on allows only 4x8. Can I just increase the depth of the
> 4x8 to compensate for this, or generate 2 GHSP heat exchangers - one 4x8
> and another 1x8.****
>
>  ****
>
> Any thoughts are appreciated.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks****
>
> -Rohini****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120820/504ccd73/attachment-0002.htm>