[Equest-users] Fan Cycling Indication in Detailed Report?
Michael Mantai
mmantai at systemworcx.com
Wed Feb 1 11:35:58 PST 2012
I tried this but it had no effect. My annual kWh equals my total fan power
times 8760, so I¹m certain that the fans are on continuously. There must be
something that is keeping them on, but I cannot find it.
On 2/1/12 1:52 PM, "Robby Oylear" <robbyoylear at gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On a recent project I modeled this same situation. The way I was able to
> force the system to only operate during a call for cooling or heating was by
> defining a fan schedule with all hours set to 0. Per the DOE2.2 help
> documentation on fan schedules:
> - If the value is 0, the fans are off but may be turned on by
> NIGHT-CYCLE-CTRL if zone temperatures warrant it.
>
> Make sure to allow night cycle control (cycle on any). This basically defines
> all hours of the day to be "night" and the fan will cycle on to meet the load
> in the space.
>
> Robby Oylear, LEED AP
> Mechanical Project Engineer
> Senior Energy Analyst
>
> D 206-788-4571
> www.rushingco.com <http://www.rushingco.com/>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Chris Hadlock <cjhadlock at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I would just run an hourly report for one of your heat pump systems and pick
>> up hourly flow rate and fan energy. This way you can see how often your fans
>> are running and whether they are cycling or running continuously. With heat
>> pump systems, there are key words under the Fans tab (for a given system)
>> that will indicate the control on the fans. One is night cycle control and
>> the other is indoor fan mode (within the Flow Parameters tab). If your fans
>> are not cycling, it is likely due to those two key words (or the fan schedule
>> you have specified).
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Mantai <mmantai at systemworcx.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I'm modeling a 6-story hotel. Baseline is PTAC. I set up the baseline to
>>> have outside air at each PTAC with the fans running continuously. The
>>> Proposed Case is watersource heat pumps. Outside air is through dedicated
>>> units at the corridors. I've set (at least I am trying to set) the heat
>>> pump fans to cycle on the thermostat. I've set the heat pumps to 0 CFM
>>> outside air. When I run the two models, the ventilation fan energy is
>>> nearly identical. I expected to see some fan energy savings with the heat
>>> pump fans cycling. When I look at the detailed output report, the SS-C for
>>> the heat pumps seems like it is showing fans running continuously. I say
>>> this because the "hours floating" are less than the "hours fans on", and the
>>> "hours fans cycle on" is zero. This implies to me that the fans are running
>>> continuously. However, when I look at the reports that show fan energy
>>> consumption, the months with floating hours show significantly reduced fan
>>> energy, which to me implies that they are cycling. The total fan kW in the
>>> proposed model is about twice that of the baseline, so from that standpoint
>>> maybe the kWh being about the same is correct. I set up the PTAC units at
>>> .3 watts/CFM per ASHRAE. I set up the heat pumps fans with a static
>>> pressure input from the design drawings rather than input the fan motor
>>> sizes (used .2" w.g. Static).
>>>
>>> Also, my space cooling energy is higher in the proposed case than the
>>> baseline, even though the envelope is better, the watersource heat pumps
>>> have a lower EIR and the design lighting power density is 30% lower. I
>>> haven't dug into that yet because I'm still trying to verify my fan cycling
>>> is working.
>>>
>>> My questions are, can anyone explain how to interpret the SS-C reports in
>>> terms of fan cycling, or point me to which report I should look to really
>>> verify the fans are cycling? And anyone modeled a similar comparison, and
>>> if so, what type of results did you get with respect to cooling energy and
>>> fan power consumption? Seems like I should be seeing savings.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Equest-users mailing list
>>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
>>> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Equest-users mailing list
>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
>> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120201/892ef6e8/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list