[Equest-users] Fan Cycling Indication in Detailed Report?

Molly Curtz molly.curtz at arup.com
Thu Feb 2 10:31:46 PST 2012


Michael,
You should also take a look at your zone exhaust fan inputs. Since OSA will be forced on to balance any exhaust flow out, this could be related to your system operation.

David, with regard to the your below advice on MIN-AIR-SCH, I typically use the value of 0.001 as suggested in the eQuest Help file for nighttime hours - this will enable the economizer, but set the %OS requirement very low. In this case the system is allowed to open the OA damper up as needed to maintain the desired discharge temp, but is only required to use a very low percent of OSA. Do you have a reason for using "0" rather than "0.001"?
The zone exhaust fans still run during any night cycle hours - which I think forces the OSA up to match that.

Kind Regards,



Molly Curtz
Mechanical Engineer

Arup
403 Columbia Street  Suite 220 Seattle WA 98104
t +1 206 749 9674  d +1 206 493 2234
f +1 206 749 0665
www.arup.com

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of David Reddy
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:20 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan Cycling Indication in Detailed Report?

Michael-

For zonal systems, I'd suggest reviewing the ZONE heating and cooling SS-P reports as another way to see what is going on.  I just reviewed these reports for a current project, and found that I get nearly the same results for both DOE-2 system types HP and PTAC using these two fan control options:

 1.  No outside air specified at SYSTEM or ZONE level, FAN-SCHEDULE set to all 1's, and FAN-CONTROL = CYCLING
 2.  No outside air specified at SYSTEM or ZONE level, and as Robby suggested, FAN-SCHEDULE set to all 0's and NIGHT-CYCLE-CONTROL = CYCLE-ON-ANY
Attached is an xlsx summary for one zone using one of these scenarios.  As you can see, the system fans are not running 8760.  The report indicates 6010 run hrs.  However, as indicated part-load hour summary, the there are many values lower in the range, indicating the system is only cycling on for a fraction of the hour.  The total annual effective full load hours is only 1166.

A couple things to try:

 *   What DOE-2 system type are you using?  A zonal system, such as HP or PTAC?  If you are using a single-zone system, such as PSZ or PVVT, then FAN-CONTROL = CYCLING has no impact.  If you only want the system to cycle on to meet loads, you have to set INDOOR-FAN-MODE = INTERMITTENT (CONSTANT is the DOE-2 default).
 *   Do you specify outdoor air at the SYSTEM or ZONE level?  If you truly want no OA supplied by the system, I would default all OA related keywords to "no_default"; a zero value may still be recognized by the program as a value and hence, cause the system to run 24/7.

Also, related to the night-cycle control option, remember to define a MIN-AIR-SCH with 0's during unoccupied hours.  Otherwise, when the system cycles on at night to meet the setback temp, the OA dampers will remain open.  This is a bit of a tradeoff, since it also disables the economizer.  But for heating dominated climates, where cycling is most often to meet heating load, this is typically the best way to go.  Otherwise, if you are comparing two designs (i.e. proposed and LEED basline), the design with better envelope performance is more likely to not have as many night cycle hours, and hence, use less energy heating (or possibly cooling) ventilation air.   This oversight can have a huge impact on savings comparisons...
Hope this helps,
- David


On 2/1/2012 11:35 AM, Michael Mantai wrote:
I tried this but it had no effect.  My annual kWh equals my total fan power times 8760, so I'm certain that the fans are on continuously.  There must be something that is keeping them on, but I cannot find it.


On 2/1/12 1:52 PM, "Robby Oylear" <robbyoylear at gmail.com> wrote:
Michael,

On a recent project I modeled this same situation.  The way I was able to force the system to only operate during a call for cooling or heating was by defining a fan schedule with all hours set to 0.  Per the DOE2.2 help documentation on fan schedules:
-   If the value is 0, the fans are off but may be turned on by NIGHT-CYCLE-CTRL if zone temperatures warrant it.

Make sure to allow night cycle control (cycle on any).  This basically defines all hours of the day to be "night" and the fan will cycle on to meet the load in the space.

Robby Oylear, LEED AP
Mechanical Project Engineer
Senior Energy Analyst

D 206-788-4571
www.rushingco.com<http://www.rushingco.com> <http://www.rushingco.com/>

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Chris Hadlock <cjhadlock at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Michael,

I would just run an hourly report for one of your heat pump systems and pick up hourly flow rate and fan energy. This way you can see how often your fans are running and whether they are cycling or running continuously. With heat pump systems, there are key words under the Fans tab (for a given system) that will indicate the control on the fans. One is night cycle control and the other is indoor fan mode (within the Flow Parameters tab). If your fans are not cycling, it is likely due to those two key words (or the fan schedule you have specified).

Chris


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Mantai <mmantai at systemworcx.com> wrote:
I'm modeling a 6-story hotel.  Baseline is PTAC.  I set up the baseline to
have outside air at each PTAC with the fans running continuously.  The
Proposed Case is watersource heat pumps.  Outside air is through dedicated
units at the corridors.  I've set (at least I am trying to set) the heat
pump fans to cycle on the thermostat.  I've set the heat pumps to 0 CFM
outside air.  When I run the two models, the ventilation fan energy is
nearly identical.  I expected to see some fan energy savings with the heat
pump fans cycling.  When I look at the detailed output report, the SS-C for
the heat pumps seems like it is showing fans running continuously.  I say
this because the "hours floating" are less than the "hours fans on", and the
"hours fans cycle on" is zero.  This implies to me that the fans are running
continuously.  However, when I look at the reports that show fan energy
consumption, the months with floating hours show significantly reduced fan
energy, which to me implies that they are cycling.  The total fan kW in the
proposed model is about twice that of the baseline, so from that standpoint
maybe the kWh being about the same is correct.  I set up the PTAC units at
.3 watts/CFM per ASHRAE.  I set up the heat pumps fans with a static
pressure input from the design drawings rather than input the fan motor
sizes (used .2" w.g. Static).

Also, my space cooling energy is higher in the proposed case than the
baseline, even though the envelope is better, the watersource heat pumps
have a lower EIR and the design lighting power density is 30% lower.  I
haven't dug into that yet because I'm still trying to verify my fan cycling
is working.

My questions are, can anyone explain how to interpret the SS-C reports in
terms of fan cycling, or point me to which report I should look to really
verify the fans are cycling?  And anyone modeled a similar comparison, and
if so, what type of results did you get with respect to cooling energy and
fan power consumption?  Seems like I should be seeing savings.


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG





_______________________________________________

Equest-users mailing list

http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org

To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG<mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
____________________________________________________________
Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup  business
systems are scanned for acceptability of content and viruses
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120202/0f51120a/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list