[Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

[Bishop, Bill]

Yes, that is the guide linked to below. I would like a copy of the fan curves shown in Appendix 5. I was hoping to save time if someone already has them in an input file or TXT file, rather than PDF.

Thanks,
Bill


From: R B [mailto:slv3sat at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 11:37 AM
To: Bishop, Bill
Cc: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

Was looking at it the other day - not sure if this is what you are referring to. The file is EDR_VAV_Guide_5-2-07 (too big to attach). see page 210 onwards.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Bishop, Bill <bbishop at pathfinder-ea.com<mailto:bbishop at pathfinder-ea.com>> wrote:
Would anyone like to share an input file (or paste the text into an email) with all the fan curves described in the EDR resource below? (Advanced Variable Air Volume VAV System Design Guide<http://www.energydesignresources.com/media/2651/EDR_DesignGuidelines_VAV.pdf>) The guide references a "New DOE-2 Fan Curves.txt" text file but I have no idea where/if I can download it. Yes, I probably could have typed it out myself by now but this gives me an excuse to post.
I offer the following curve-fit for Appendix G., Table G3.1.3.15 for any of you that don't already have it for your LEED Baseline models. (Just copy and paste into the "Performance Curves" section of the input file.):

"App G VAV Fan FPLR" = CURVE-FIT
   TYPE             = CUBIC
   INPUT-TYPE       = COEFFICIENTS
   COEFFICIENTS     = ( 0.0013, 0.147, 0.9506, -0.0998 )
   ..

Thanks,
Bill

Error! Filename not specified.<mailto:wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com>


From: Nick Caton [mailto:ncaton at smithboucher.com<mailto:ncaton at smithboucher.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:45 PM
To: Paul Riemer; Bishop, Bill; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>

Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

I've also been surprised at the magnitudes involved, but these kinds of savings do seem very real.  One fundamental I had to wrap my head around (confirmed with some controls servicing contacts) is that large supply fans with VSD's should rarely operate at or near full capacity when a system is being controlled correctly.

Small differences as the curves approach zero really add up over 8760 hours however.  The EDR resource linked below is really a better teacher than myself, but if you'll compare the curves I posted below, you'll notice they're actually very different at most PLR's.  Actually I can overlay these pretty quickly with my personal curve spreadsheet:

Error! Filename not specified.

When looking at these: consider the same system operating at any given PLR:  The difference may seem small, but at 20% PLR the system with the library curve is drawing double the energy of the 90.1 curve.  Similar story but inversed around the 40% mark.  Bill's model producing a ~50% difference in fan energy consumption between the curves is not outside the realm of reason considering this -his hourly PLR distribution through the year and minimum flow ratios would factor in, of course.

I more strongly do not believe these two particular curves are apples-to-apples however.  My present understanding is the library VSD curve (the "Nike swoosh") represents a VSD fan system without static pressure reset (as prescribed by 90.1).  The other curve shape (umm... "upturned banana?") does look like fan system curves incorporating a static reset sequence, but it's still weird that it actually approaches zero at zero (well technically 0.0013)... .

This is something I haven't reconciled with reality just yet... One thought is it would appear to represent a perfectly efficient duct system with zero static pressure to overcome at low flows - perhaps that means for a level playing field we're supposed to assume the same for a proposed curve?  Is there language in 90.1/users' manual that explicitly says something along the lines of "duct/pipe distribution losses are not supposed to be modeled?"

Still mulling this over... =)

~Nick

Error! Filename not specified.

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036<tel:913.344.0036>
fax 913.345.0617<tel:913.345.0617>
www.smithboucher.com<http://www.smithboucher.com>

From: Paul Riemer [mailto:Paul.Riemer at dunhameng.com<mailto:Paul.Riemer at dunhameng.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:06 PM
To: 'Bishop, Bill'; Nick Caton; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

I agree it is not trivial but I am really surprised by that 50.8% number.  I think the curves are relatively similar at the high end and most systems rarely spend time on the low end where the curves do differ considerably.  Is there a big difference in the system volumes, specifically are the baseline fans bigger in volume and thus always operating at a lower ratio than the proposed?

Generally, I assume that the curve in 90.1 was supposed to represent a VAV VFD curve and that my VAV VFD fans should not be penalized against it.  VAV vs. CAV is trickier and brings the temptation to switch your rationale based on which side your project falls on.

Paul Riemer, PE, LEED AP BD+C
DUNHAM

From: Bishop, Bill [mailto:wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com<mailto:wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:07 PM
To: Nick Caton; Paul Riemer; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals - Appendix G models

Nick's concern about VAV fan curves is not trivial. I am working on a LEED model using Baseline System 5 (PVAV). The Baseline fan energy using the 90.1 G3.1.3.15 VAV FPLR curve is 50.8% more than the fan energy using the default eQUEST "Variable Speed Drive FPLR" curve. YMMV of course but that is a big difference. This penalizes the Baseline for my project - the total electrical use increases 8.9% in the Baseline vs. only a 4.1% increase in the Proposed model when switching to the same G3.1.3.15 curve.

Bill

Error! Filename not specified.

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org>] On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Paul Riemer; Dahlstrom, Aaron; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Paul & others:

I just wanted to say off the bat:  the EDR resource Paul linked us looks to address the heart of my query directly (and thank you so much!), but it's difficult for me to summarize further right now...

I think I'll need to re-read the appropriate parts of this document a few times over and arrive at a deeper understanding of actual methods/sequencing strategies for static pressure reset before I come to any definite conclusions regarding VAV fan curve.

The query I'm trying to nail down is what assumptions and specific system behaviors the DOE2 library/default curves and particularly the prescribed 90.1-2007 baseline curve represent, and from there answer what's fair game insofar as defining/modifying a different sort of EIR-FPLR curve for a proposed model.  I have the understanding that the associated fan energy savings between various approaches are potentially big and real, but I'm scratching the surface of how to actually model it to a realistic degree.

If anyone has pondered the same topic or is a few strides ahead of me and wishes to share any thoughts/guidance, please do not hesitate =).

~Nick

Error! Filename not specified.

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036<tel:913.344.0036>
fax 913.345.0617<tel:913.345.0617>
www.smithboucher.com<http://www.smithboucher.com>

From: Paul Riemer [mailto:Paul.Riemer at dunhameng.com<mailto:Paul.Riemer at dunhameng.com>]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 7:21 AM
To: 'Dahlstrom, Aaron'; Nick Caton; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

As for fans I suggest two resources:
Advanced Variable Air Volume VAV System Design Guide<http://www.energydesignresources.com/media/2651/EDR_DesignGuidelines_VAV.pdf> by Energy Design Resources has some good discussion and suggested fan curves.

Reid Hart of PECI did a presentation to BSUG on September 16, 2009 on fan curves and static pressure reset.    BSUG posted their items, including this one, to their yahoo group at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/BSUG/files/. BSUG has morphed into BESF and has a new home at http://energytrust.org/business/building-energy-simulation/.

Paul Riemer, PE, LEED AP BD+C
DUNHAM

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org>] On Behalf Of Dahlstrom, Aaron
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 12:03 AM
To: Nick Caton; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Nick -

We're in the midst of asking the same questions about the Pump-Power-fFlow equations.

I imagine in both types of flow networks there may some fixed pressure drops that won't be reduced:

1)      Min static pressure across flow control devices (VAV boxes, water control valves)

2)      Static pressure in critical branches that may not be at reduced flow, even though the overall flow network is at reduced flow

3)      In staged plants, static pressure across individual constant-volume plant components (eg in our case, chiller 1 of 6 always has 12 psig, regardless of whether it is the only chiller on or not)

With this mixture of fixed and variable pressure drops, I imagine multiple different power-versus-flow curves for the same building, depending on the physical location of the prime movers and the intervening pinch points / critical flow networks. 20000 cfm out of a peak 30000 cfm fan probably looks different in terms of power depending whether the majority is headed to west zones from an east mechanical room 400 ft away or headed to east zones just a few feet away.

Probably the most accurate method would be explicitly defining the flow network and calculating these pressure drops dynamically (if the modeler had the time to do that explicitly, or software cool enough (BIM?) to do it automatically). Anyone familiar enough with Energy Plus to know if that's a feature?

I guess no answers here, just more questions ...

Aaron Dahlstrom , PE, LEED(r) AP
In Posse - A subsidiary of AKF| 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1414, Philadelphia, PA 19102
d: 215-282-6753<tel:215-282-6753>| m: 267-507-5470<tel:267-507-5470>| In Posse: 215-282-6800<tel:215-282-6800>| AKF: 215-735-7290<tel:215-735-7290>
e: ADahlstrom at in-posse.com<mailto:ADahlstrom at in-posse.com> | in posse web: www.in-posse.com<http://www.in-posse.com/> | akf web: www.akfgroup.com<http://www.akfgroup.com/>



From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org>] On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:08 PM
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Bill Bishop suggested a good clarification that I want to take on.  I've edited my language below (highlighted) to clarify the question I'm trying to pose.

~Nick

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]<mailto:[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org]> On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:32 AM
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: [Equest-users] Fan energy fundamentals

Hi everyone!

A recent discussion with a mechanical mentor brought up a question I'd like to share with the list...  If anyone has a partial or complete response I think we'd all benefit and appreciate it if you'd share your thoughts!

For a given duct distribution system, you've got a certain static drop.  At full flow, your supply fan also has to deal with a certain velocity pressure drop due to friction with the duct distribution.  If you reduce the supply airflow rate, you also lower the velocity and therefore the velocity pressure drops for the given duct distribution.  The net result is system supply fan has a lower total pressure drop to overcome, and so should operate more efficiently.

Does anyone know:  Whether we choose "variable speed" fan control, use the FAN-EIR-FPLR curve generated by the wizards, or use the VSD curve defined in 90.1 appendix G... are we simultaneously accounting for the efficiency gains due to lowered velocity pressure drop in addition to the drop in fan energy from lower RPMs?  If this is not accounted for inside/outside the fan curves, is there a direct way to define that or logically work it into the curves?

If it helps anyone answer, I can illustrate from recent checks that the wizard-generated FAN-EIR-FPLR curve has a "Nike Swoosh" shape with an inflection around the 20% mark.  This shape best matches the (limited) data I've seen for "real world" VSD input measurements.  Here's a screenshot:

Error! Filename not specified.

The following illustrates the 90.1-2007 VAV curve we're made to use for baseline systems 5-8 (I haven't checked to see if this still applies to 2010).  It does not have the same "inflection point" as zero is approached.  I think it's based on the fan law power equation or something similar that doesn't account for motor/VSD losses:

Error! Filename not specified.

The help files illustrate a different, third shape for "variable speed" control different from both of the above...

Error! Filename not specified.

Seeing these side-by-side raises another question for me regarding 90.1-2007 intent/practice... not specific to eQuest... but I've already spent too much of my time today writing this out!  Another day =)...

Thanks in advance for anyone joining in the discussion!

~Nick

Error! Filename not specified.

NICK CATON, P.E.
SENIOR ENGINEER

Smith & Boucher Engineers
25501 west valley parkway, suite 200
olathe, ks 66061
direct 913.344.0036<tel:913.344.0036>
fax 913.345.0617<tel:913.345.0617>
www.smithboucher.com<http://www.smithboucher.com>


This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with In Posse.

_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG<mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120224/c85045de/attachment-0002.htm>