[Equest-users] LEED Credit EAc5.1

Dionisio Franca dionisiofranca at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 16:38:51 PST 2013


Hi Tom,

The New South Wales Measurement and Verification Guides have good
guidance and examples M&V accuracy calculations:

http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/climateChange/MVOperationGde.htm

Best,
Dio

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Richard Ellison
<REllison at southlandind.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
>
>
> International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol Jan 2012 Vol
> 1 and ASHRAE Guideline 14 provide the best guidance.  This is what I put in
> my M&V plans “…the performance period is 12 months the computer model shall
> have an NMBE of 5% and a CV(RMSE) of 15% relative to monthly utility bills.
> If this accuracy is not met the possible reasons for the variance will be
> noted in the final M&V report.
>
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> R I C H A R D  E L L I S O N
> BEAP, BEMP, BESA, CBEP, CEA, CEM, CMVP, CTAB, DGCP, HBDP, LEED AP, PE
>
> Manager of Energy and Simulation
>
> Southland Industries
>
> 22340 Dresden Street, Suite 177
>
> Dulles, VA 20166
>
> Office: 703.834.5570
>
> Direct: 703.834.2438
>
> Fax: 703.834.5572
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Tom Mickley
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:18 PM
> To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
> Cc: Andy Meermans; Lilly Maniet
> Subject: [Equest-users] LEED Credit EAc5.1
>
>
>
> LEED members and eQuesters,
>
>
>
> I am using eQuest to model a mixed use office building in Cleveland, Ohio
> for a LEED CS project.  We are currently attempting the EAc5.1 credit and
> are using the IPMVP option D.  After a review response, I was asked to
> ‘Identify the acceptable range(s) of error (generally there is a different
> range allowable for both monthly and annual data).’  After some internet
> browsing, all I found was estimated percentages from a LEED member, which
> was more of an overall response and not specific to eQuest.
>
>
>
> Does eQuest have an acceptable level of calculation error between monthly
> and annual data?  Or is this project specific?  Has anyone else come across
> this response?  If so, how did you come up acceptable ranges of error?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Tom Mickley
>
> Mechanical Engineer CEM
>
> The K Company
>
> Cell 330 760 3994
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>



More information about the Equest-users mailing list