[Equest-users] stumped re. excessive heating

Chris Jones cj at enersave.ca
Wed Mar 6 08:24:13 PST 2013


I used Botota for the weather file.  For system 
UMA 102, I changd the cool control to Warmest and 
Heat Control to coldest and changed the reset 
priority to Temperature First.  The heating 
energy is cut in half.  Do that on all the 
systems and you man chop all the heating in half.

The danger of self-sizing with program default is 
you don't know what or why the results don't appear correct.


At 10:13 AM 06/03/2013, Christian Stalberg wrote:
>Here you go.
>
>
>---
>Christian Stalberg
>Principal
>Natural Intelligence, LLC
><blocked::blocked::http://naturalintelligence.us/>http://naturalintelligence.us 
>
>Tel. 919.986.9237
>
>
>From: Paul Diglio [mailto:paul.diglio at sbcglobal.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 9:54 AM
>To: cstalberg at naturalintelligence.us; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
>Subject: Re: [Equest-users] stumped re. excessive heating
>
>Christian:
>
>Can you post your pd2 and inp files so we can take a look?
>
>Paul Diglio, CEM, CBCP
>87 Fairmont Avenue
>New Haven, CT 06513
>203-415-0082
>
><http://www.pdigliollc.com>www.pdigliollc.com
>
>
>
>From: Christian Stalberg 
><<mailto:cstalberg at naturalintelligence.us>cstalberg at naturalintelligence.us>
>To: 
><mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
>Sent: Wed, March 6, 2013 9:06:59 AM
>Subject: [Equest-users] stumped re. excessive heating
>I have a proposed building in a  tropical climate with CHW cooling and
>no heating. Per ASHRAE I’m installing electric heat in both the Baseline
>and Proposed models. The heating in the Proposed is double what it is
>in the Baseline. Worse yet, I am getting the following warning:
>
>**WARNING**********************************************************************
>              ZONE EL1 East Perim Zn (G.E19)
>              might have insufficient heating capability.
>              Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
>              ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
>              specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE load
>              (see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)
>
>              SYSTEM UMA 102
>              which supplies the above listed ZONE, has a design heating
>              coil exit temperature, HEAT-SET-T,(plus any zone reheat)
>              below its MAX-SUPPLY-T or the ZONE DESIGN-HEAT-T, which
>              might account for the insufficient heating capability.
>
>
>Does eQUEST overcompensate for an erroneous config for heating such that
>it would behave this way? What should I look for?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>---
>Christian Stalberg
>Principal
>Natural Intelligence, LLC
><http://naturalintelligence.us>http://naturalintelligence.us
>Tel. 919.986.9237
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Equest-users mailing list
>http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a 
>blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG

 >>
Christopher Jones, P.Eng.
Suite 1801, 1 Yonge Street
Toronto, ON M5E1W7
Tel. 416-203-7465
Fax. 416-946-1005
email cj at enersave.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20130306/eb05f2d6/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list