[Equest-users] Baseline vs proposed fuel consumption problem

Gregory Stevens gstevens at gse-solutions.com
Tue Feb 17 20:43:30 PST 2015

Based on past experience, the increase in gas consumption may be a result of installing LED lighting.  The interactive effect of having more efficient lighting is less internal heat gain, which ultimately increases the need for more space heating.

From: Equest-users [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Chris Baker
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 8:12 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Baseline vs proposed fuel consumption problem

Here's a question for you equest folks out there!

I'm working on equest modeling for LEED cert.  The project is a religious worship building here in Alaska.  It was built in 1940's with CMU exterior walls and minimal interior insulation.
The proposed model shows how we added 5" of EIFS along the exterior, new interior wall furring with insulation and we added a substantial foam buildup on the roof.

We also replaced all lighting with LED, along with completely new HVAC and heating systems.

The baseline model shows the lightweight assembly types from ASHRAE Appendix G table 5.5-8 (for our climate zone).  All the R values, U values and thermal reflectance are compliant with ASHRAE minimums for Alaska.

Proposed and Baseline building envelopes are accurately modeled.

The fuel type currently in my proposed model is fuel oil (Condensing HW Boiler).
The fuel type currently in my baseline model is natural gas (Packaged VAV/ac system type 3 - required for this climate zone).

My question is: Does the baseline need to show the same fuel type as in the proposed or does ASHRAE Appendix G determine the fuel type as natural gas?

Here's the problem...
My gas consumption is very high in proposed model when compared with the baseline.

My baseline Gas consumption (BtU x000,000): 3044.1
My proposed Gas consumption (BtU x000,000): 4552.3

My baseline Elec consumption (kWh x000): 208.74
My proposed Elec consumption (kWh x000): 147.43

But we don't feel this accurately depicts the annual cost savings we provided.  The proposed gas consumption should be less.  Not the other way around.

Could something as simple as fuel type be driving this difference?

I should note that FM1 (fuel meter 1) is the same in both models with utility rate at $3.95 per unit (which is from published data for local fuel oil cost).

Chris Baker
CCI CAD Drafter


CCI-Alliance Confidentiality notice: This message is intended only for the person to whom addressed in the text above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not that person, any use of this message is prohibited. We request that you notify us by reply to this message, and then delete all copies of this message including any contained in your reply. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20150218/161f12a5/attachment.htm>

More information about the Equest-users mailing list